Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three interceptors in place at Fort Greely
Fairbanks Daily News-Miner ^ | Friday, September 17, 2004 | SAM BISHOP

Posted on 09/17/2004 8:27:27 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar

WASHINGTON--A third interceptor in the national missile defense system went into a silo at Fort Greely on Wednesday, according to the Missile Defense Agency.

The first interceptor was put in the ground in July. The agency installed a second Sept. 4 without an announcement.

Wednesday's installation gets the agency halfway to its goal of six interceptors for the year. The final three will be in the ground by mid-October, according to MDA spokesman Rick Lehner.

Meanwhile, the agency has delayed a test involving a target missile to be launched from the state-owned site on Kodiak Island. The launch, which already had been delayed, is now planned for late November or early December, Lehner said.

Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, said Thursday he understood that computer software in the interceptor booster to be used in the test had problems. The booster is now at a launch pad on the Kwajalein Atoll in the far western Pacific Ocean. The interceptor will have to be shipped back to Huntsville, Ala., Stevens said.

Stevens said he wasn't concerned by the delay. The interceptor booster is of a different sort than those being installed at Fort Greely.

Orbital Sciences built the interceptor boosters used at Greely. They will not be launched as part of the ongoing testing because of concerns about debris falling on land.

The three interceptors at Greely are not yet ready to fire in an emergency, though, Lehner said.

"They're not operational," he said. "That's going to be for Strategic Command and Northern Command to decide when they're ready to go."

President Bush's administration has pledged to have a rudimentary missile defense system working by the end of the year.

Sen. John Kerry, Bush's Democratic opponent in the Nov. 2 election, opposes fielding the system at this point, saying it should be more thoroughly tested.

In the meantime, he has called for cuts in the MDA's budget for the ground-based midcourse system, in which the Greely interceptors are the main component.

Under current plans, another 10 interceptors will be installed at Fort Greely next year, bringing the total there to 16.

Four interceptors also will be located at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California by early next year, Lehner said.

After that, the MDA's plans call for another 10 interceptors at Fort Greely on an unspecified schedule and then another 10 elsewhere in the country or overseas, Lehner said. That would bring the total to 40 interceptors.

Washington, D.C., reporter Sam Bishop can be reached at sbishop@newsminer.com or (202) 662-8721.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/17/2004 8:27:33 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Just remember that in the 80's and 90's democrats said Star Wars would never work.


2 posted on 09/17/2004 8:31:02 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator (I am poster #48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

ping


3 posted on 09/17/2004 8:33:03 AM PDT by madison46 (Bandwagon was full when it left the gate - I hope it remains too full for frogs & co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

While common wisdom will be that it is the Middle East that is W's legacy, implementing a nuclear shield will be the longest lasting one.
We have a huge technology lead and if we fail to use it, we are either fools or democrats.


4 posted on 09/17/2004 8:34:21 AM PDT by ProudVet77 (Bathrobe Bombardier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar
Sen. John Kerry, Bush's Democratic opponent in the Nov. 2 election, opposes fielding the system at this point, saying it should be more thoroughly tested.

Libs just can't stand it when the U.S. defends itself -- the more we're vulnerable, the happier they are.

5 posted on 09/17/2004 8:54:22 AM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
Just remember that in the 80's and 90's democrats said Star Wars would never work.

Libs never care if domestic programs "work." In fact, the more wasterful the programs are, the better. But defense programs had better be 100% perfect (an unobtainable goal) before they get any support from the left.

6 posted on 09/17/2004 8:56:42 AM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Even if there is a hypothetical 10% chance that any such system would work, we'd be fools not to implement it. I would rather have 10% than 0%. North Korea was blowing up a dam? And it caused a two mile radius mushroom cloud? Yeh, right.

Right100


7 posted on 09/17/2004 9:26:14 AM PDT by right100
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
This would not be necessary if Jimmy Carter had not shafted us on the SALT II treaty. Jimmy Carter came to the following terms with the former Soviet Union: If you promise not to use nuke's against America, we won't nuke America. Debbie Schussel
8 posted on 09/17/2004 11:15:57 AM PDT by Redball2202 (If you can't say 'Amen', say 'Ouch'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

"Regan's legacy is our safety" ping


9 posted on 09/17/2004 3:47:34 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redball2202

That Chick calls in on the Howard Stern Show Right?


10 posted on 09/17/2004 3:49:24 PM PDT by cmsgop ( Bong Hits, Fraggle Rock Reruns and DU is no way to go through Life.......... I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

I hope these are set up at more sites in the future.


11 posted on 09/18/2004 1:11:39 AM PDT by rdl6989 (<fontface="Rather Not">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

That is in the works.


12 posted on 09/18/2004 1:14:02 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

I'm glad of that. I fear that N. Korea or some future enemy might launch a missle at us.


13 posted on 09/18/2004 2:16:28 AM PDT by rdl6989 (<fontface="Rather Not">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989
Missile? You must mean a space peaceful exploration satellite.

PYONGYANG, North Korea (CNN, July 2000) -- A day after surprising analysts by saying North Korea was willing to abandon its missile program, Russian President Vladimir Putin left North Korea for the G8 summit in Japan.

Putin's comment -- that North Korea would end its missile program if other nations provided it with rocket technology for space exploration -- was expected to receive attention during the G8 summit.

Putin, the first Russian leader to visit North Korea, offered few details about how a program of shared technology would work, or who would finance it. He also told reporters that North Korean leader Kim Jong Il had assured him that North Korea's missile program was only used for peaceful purposes.

"The North Korean government is prepared to use exclusively the rocket technology of other nations if they provide such an opportunity for the peaceful exploration of space," Putin said.

14 posted on 09/18/2004 2:19:46 AM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
Just remember that in the 80's and 90's democrats said Star Wars would never work.

Even more idiotically, they kept insisting that if it wasn't 100% effective it was not worth pursuing.

15 posted on 09/18/2004 2:31:17 AM PDT by Publius6961 (I don't do diplomacy either)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

It has aleady happened. See this.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/856644/posts

It burned up, but it was close. They have made improvements in their programs and AK, HI are easy and a long shot, California.


16 posted on 09/18/2004 2:32:09 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rdl6989

And see this.

You be the judge.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=North+Korean+Missile+Warhead+Found+in+Alaska


17 posted on 09/18/2004 2:36:07 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar (Who would the terrorists vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Even more idiotically, they kept insisting that if it wasn't 100% effective it was not worth pursuing.

They just said that in order to obfuscate their anti-American feelings.

18 posted on 09/18/2004 5:08:56 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator (I am poster #48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ProudVet77
fools or democrats

Redundancy Alert!

19 posted on 09/18/2004 5:16:02 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Tourette's syndrome is just a $&#$*!% excuse for poor *%$#** language skills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar

Thank You for this information! I didn't know this. I knew they fired one over Japan a few years ago that fell apart. The public should have been told more about this. Leave it to the MSM to not report the real stories.


20 posted on 09/18/2004 4:13:06 PM PDT by rdl6989 (<fontface="Rather Not">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson