Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ketchikan

My brother, who has been in the National Guard for more than 20 years, told me tonight on the phone that Bush's records would not have been retained by the TANG after he was discharged (early 1970's). The records would have been sent to the DOD records storage facility in Kansas City where they would have been transposed to microfiche and stored. This makes Burkett's story about the Bush file being laundered in the 1990's false.

I wish someone with hands-on knowledge about the records handling would opine on this subject.


33 posted on 09/16/2004 5:23:15 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brad from Tennessee
The records would have been sent to the DOD records storage facility in Kansas City where they would have been transposed to microfiche and stored.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I thought the long term archive of DOD records was in Colorado. But this doesn't take away from the main point... removing old records from Texas in the 90s would be pointless without also hitting the archives. Somewhat harder to do, that.

47 posted on 09/16/2004 6:12:27 PM PDT by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: Brad from Tennessee

I don't know about the TANG, but my records (at least the important stuff) were kept in microfiche form WHILE I was on active duty. Only the local command had paper copies. I know this because part of the process for making Chief Petty Officer was to request a copy and REVIEW them before the selection board did and correct any errors.


58 posted on 09/16/2004 6:32:30 PM PDT by PogySailor (Proud member of the RAM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson