Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoctorZIn

Sharon downplays nuclear strike on Iran



Wednesday September 15, 2004 13:39 - (SA)
JERUSALEM - Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon says Iran and its nuclear ambitions represent "a very great danger" to the Jewish state but played down the prospect of a pre-emptive strike on its atomic facilities.

"Iran constitutes a very great danger, due to its efforts to acquire nuclear weapons and means of launching them," Sharon said in an interview with the Yediot Aharonot daily.

"This is a country where the moderates speak in terms of destroying Israel and the Jewish people, and in fact engage in terror."

Tehran insists its nuclear programme, currently being scrutinised by the UN nuclear watchdog, is strictly limited to meeting energy needs.

But the head of Israel's military intelligence, General Aharon Zeevi, claimed earlier this week that Tehran could be in a position next year to develop nuclear weapons without outside help.

Asked if that meant Israel needed to carry out a pre-emptive strike against Iran, similar to the one launched against Iraq's French-built Osirak reactor in 1981, Sharon said that times had changed and instead called for the threat posed by Iran to be addressed by the United Nations.

"Menahem Begin (the Israeli prime minister at the time of the Osirak bombing) made a very brave decision," Sharon said. "I had great influence on that decision."

"In the meantime, things have changed. Israel is not leading the campaign against Iran's nuclear armament."

"What Israel needs are protective means and deterrent ability. The world must put heavy pressure on Iran, economic and diplomatic pressure. We have not yet reached the point of no return. We must bring this matter to the UN Security Council."

Israeli deputy chief of staff General Dan Halutz also called for more international pressure to be exerted on Iran but said a time could come when Israel had to take matters into its own hands.

"We will rely on other parties for the moment but only up to a point when we will have to rely only on ourselves," Halutz told the paper.

Sharon's government has come to regard Iran as its greatest enemy since the downfall of Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq last year.

Israel itself refuses to confirm it has a nuclear arsenal but is estimated to possess some 200 warheads. Unlike Iran, it has not signed the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
5 posted on 09/15/2004 9:07:39 PM PDT by DoctorZIn (Until they are Free, "We shall all be Iranians!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoctorZIn

No surprise to me about the Iranian people's true leanings. The Iranian Revolution is perhaps the most misunderstood political event of the 20th century. This is not to say anything positive about Khomeni, who hijacked the revolution long after it was won (not only the Bolshevik hijacking of the Russian Revolution). Iranians then and now overwhelmingly desire freedom. This is why the Bush Adminstration is absolutely correct in dealing with Iran differently than Iraq or N. Korea. Iran is on the edge of the second wave of their revolution. Incidentally, I expect that there will be a great reawakening of Zoroastrianism once the oppressive Ayatollah regime is tossed from power.


10 posted on 09/15/2004 9:13:04 PM PDT by Ilya Mourometz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson