Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: My2Cents

Right, and since we know the experts told them the documents "had some problems" it means they went forward knowingly with fake document deliberately and therefore CBS is culpable along with the forger of deliberately trying to skew a presidential election in time of war.

This is big, and its got legs.

That CBS "statement" was nonsense. Nobody asked if the documents were "accurate". They answered a question that no one asked.

If I forged a memo from Nixon and presented it as authentic, I couldn't argue to a judge that "Well, your honor, at least I got the facts right!!"

absolute nonsense!


232 posted on 09/15/2004 3:53:48 PM PDT by LuckyHat (Kerry burned down my village...and all I got was this lousy tee-shirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: LuckyHat

Another thing, CBS has no evidence that the "facts" of the forged memos are accurate. All they have is the forged memos, and the "recollection" of two admittedly anti-Bush partisans (one of whom's daughter said her father was lying).


341 posted on 09/15/2004 4:32:17 PM PDT by My2Cents (http://www.conservativesforbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

To: LuckyHat
Nobody asked if the documents were "accurate". They answered a question that no one asked.

Again, what evidence, what proof, does CBS have that the documents were "accurate"? Old Lady Kravitz's, or whatever her name, statements, in which she contradicted herself from her statement yesterday?

345 posted on 09/15/2004 4:35:23 PM PDT by My2Cents (http://www.conservativesforbush.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson