2. He thinks if you put sentences together well you are unusual for a "righty blogger". That means he is not well read in the area he is criticizing.
3. He clearly has not taken the time to read and sift through and understand the analysis of the documents which is available all over the web now. All he knows it used to take weeks, this tme it took hours, and that means there is something suspicious about it.
In other words, he thinks like an Old Media hack.
Well, guess what: it used to take days to travel across the state in a wagon. It now takes hours. Technology happens. Some of us have kept up. Those who haven't write long columns displaying their ignorance and paranoia.
Yes, of course. Because those of us out here posting on these boards don't have journalism degrees from universities, we're obviously not capable of writing in coherent sentences that aren't loaded with grammatical errors.
(rolling my eyes in sarcasm....)
Nah, I think he read the freeper threads on this, which is evident from his comments. He knows that we examined the docs on CBS's own website. But it doesn't fit his conspiracy theory, so he claims that we all figured this out from watching the docs on TV, which is not the case. The author didn't misunderstand or overlook that fact; he flat-out lied about it.