Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
I'm guessing that some (if not most) insurance companies would offer some sort of policy... It is just more money for them.

But, if we are talking about private companies that pass benefits on to their employees (through insurance companies group plans) they should NOT be required to offer the plan at the same rate. Because then, as you say, the cost would be spread among everyone. Anyone who wants health insurance should be able to get it as long as they pay for it. I don't know how this bill plays out in reality, but it isn't something that scares the way it seems to scare the responders of this thread.

49 posted on 09/14/2004 8:40:39 AM PDT by freestyle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: freestyle
I'm guessing that some (if not most) insurance companies would offer some sort of policy... It is just more money for them.

What I'm wondering is what would make you guess that they wouldn't already be doing it without the law. And then what you would guess was the reason for passing it at all.

51 posted on 09/14/2004 9:01:00 AM PDT by inquest (Judges are given the power to decide cases, not to decide law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson