Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USA Today acknowledges that it independently received the documents
USA Today | 9/13/04

Posted on 09/12/2004 10:18:12 PM PDT by ambrose

USA Today acknowledges that it indepedently received the documents


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cbsnews; forgery; john; kerny; killian; napalminthemorning; rather; rathergate; seebsnews; tang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-211 next last
To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY

A lot of Talion's website in the web archive looks like it was mirrored, or stolen by, topplebush.com


101 posted on 09/12/2004 11:53:39 PM PDT by idkfa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: igoramus987
Thanks for the link. Could be Strong or Burkett. Could be anyone, LOL, because they wouldn't have to have access to Killian's files because the memos were made up.

I have my own theories, but with every new revelation, they change.

In that aspect, I am much like Kerry. (Shudder!)
102 posted on 09/12/2004 11:53:51 PM PDT by M1911A1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

"Folks have no idea of the military "culture" in 1973."

So very true. I reported for pilot training in early August 1973. I got washed out for failing my flight physical, and I was far from the only med washout in that class. There were more eliminated for medical reasons than the norm. I didn't stay around long enough to know how many washed out for flying deficiencies, but I would guess that they were much higher than in the late 60's.

They were trying to get rid of pilots and potential pilots in every possible way.


103 posted on 09/12/2004 11:56:40 PM PDT by Cap Huff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

No! Your right! It's a poorly written bunch of b.s. They constantly drop lines that lead the reader to the conclusion that all is true about the charges, but always unidentified or it was reported that, and then vague about the source!


104 posted on 09/13/2004 12:03:39 AM PDT by GeorgeWashington777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: idkfa

topplebush.com also conveniently is offering free excerpts of Bev Harris's book on the new voting machines.


105 posted on 09/13/2004 12:13:50 AM PDT by GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred

"It is so clear the DNC and the Kerry campaign is involved in this. I suspect Carville and Begala are in on this for sure."

Agreed. As stupid as it was, its taken oxygen away from SwiftBoat Vet discussions.

Although I'm sure Kerry will find a way to stumble back into Vietnam.


106 posted on 09/13/2004 12:15:37 AM PDT by Fenris6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
In addition to missing the underlines in the CBS documents, the USA Today and CBS documents seem to have different markings or scribbles (were these supposed to be initials?) in the bottom right-hand corner of the following documents:

Its more than just that the USA & CBS memo show different dots markings, also the CBS memo has the address blacked out

USA

See BS
107 posted on 09/13/2004 12:21:05 AM PDT by boxerblues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: nonkultur
Heh I heard Bev Harris on Art Bell a few months ago.

Can you give us a general picture of what was said? (I'm curious because many of Bell's listeners are Libbys.)

108 posted on 09/13/2004 12:32:54 AM PDT by Marie (I want to be queeeeeen, just like like Hillary! 8 - ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

Methinks Monday will be a very long day for See BS. Hehehe!


109 posted on 09/13/2004 12:37:08 AM PDT by twntaipan (CBS News: The News of Choice of Frauds and Forgers Everywhere!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: igoramus987

"Newsweek (which likes the word "discredited") has apparently begun an external investigation: it names "a disgruntled former Guard officer" as a principal source for CBS, noting "he suffered two nervous breakdowns" and "unsuccessfully sued for medical expenses."

William Safire, NYT.

Newsweak is saying that Burkett was a "principal source".


110 posted on 09/13/2004 12:50:52 AM PDT by M1911A1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: M1911A1

That doesn't really say much. Burkett has been trying to shop his allegations for years, with no takers. He had to have a sponsor to make it all the way to Blather's attention...


111 posted on 09/13/2004 1:00:59 AM PDT by ambrose (http://www.swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: M1911A1; ambrose; All
It could be that Burkett (if that is who it is) marked the docs he gave to CBS for emphasis, and CBS or Burkett lined out the address once they decided that the documents should be posted.

Talon News received copies from CBS by fax. They don't have the markings, so CBS at one time had, or still has, "clean" copies.

Questionable Bush Service Documents

112 posted on 09/13/2004 1:23:03 AM PDT by dread78645 (Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: boxerblues; ambrose
Its more than just that the USA & CBS memo show different dots markings, also the CBS memo has the address blacked out.

I wouldn't read anything into the address being blacked out. It was clear that CBS did that for either confidentiality or CYA reasons, but they did such a bad job of blacking the address out that it was still readable.

113 posted on 09/13/2004 2:37:36 AM PDT by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane

Rather claims this story has been in the works for years. But it Seems pretty unlikely that it would all come together some 50 days before theelection. That said, this had to be a document dump on the part of some partisan hack. Rather et al. simply couldn't contain themselves.


114 posted on 09/13/2004 2:42:08 AM PDT by Cosmo (There are no memos of mass destruction, no stockpiles, no reconstituted nuclear memo programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
I have a sneaking suspicion that it's this talion.com that is behind this smear.

I'm not getting anything at talion.com

115 posted on 09/13/2004 3:04:14 AM PDT by BunnySlippers ("F" Stands for FLIP-FLOP ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Don't you just love THIS paragraph?!
USA Today (9/13/04)

Document analysts differ over whether the memos..., are genuine and could have been produced by typewriters available at Ellington Air Force Base in Houston in 1972 and 1973. Two retired FBI forensic document examiners who studied the memos at USA TODAY's request said Sunday that they probably are forgeries. Four other authorities interviewed by USA TODAY, including typewriter and type font experts, said the technology existed at the time to create the documents. None of the experts consulted offered an unequivocal opinion.

Very artfully written....LOL!

USAT hired TWO forensic document examiners who said they're probably forgeries. But (then?) they interviewed four more with a different take on it. Amazing how so many media outlets are putting forth "expert" opinions WITHOUT identifying their source! I don't believe I've ever heard of such a thing.

116 posted on 09/13/2004 3:34:49 AM PDT by Timeout (My name is Timeout....and I'm a blogaholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw

To: Carling
>>this makes Watergate look like amateur hour.
>
>Not until the Justice Dept. gets involved.

Somebody pinch this man and wake him up.


117 posted on 09/13/2004 3:35:37 AM PDT by Mike18XX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
"...The person refused to be identified out of fear of retaliation...." Yeah, like he's afraid he'll get the Jerry Parks treatment, or something.
118 posted on 09/13/2004 3:41:37 AM PDT by Mike18XX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: twntaipan

> Methinks Monday will be a very long day for SeeBS.

Watch 'em bury it, and run wall-to-wall Ivan coverage for a straight week.

You guys need to realize something: They *have* achieved their objective in propagandizing their target audience.

-- It's the same target audience that has bought, or at least acquiesced to, their shilling of the Warren Commission Report for *forty years*. Guess who the media point-man is on the yearly anniversary journalism pieces every 11/22?

Your Boy Dan. -- That's who.


119 posted on 09/13/2004 3:51:52 AM PDT by Mike18XX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: M1911A1
It could be that Burkett (if that is who it is) marked the docs he gave to CBS....

The memos were not underlined or redacted when CBS received them.

Here's a screen shot of the 60 Min II broadcast where they showed the May 19 memo...no markings. (hat tip: The Daily Recycler)

In very sloppy journalistic fashion, CBS broadcast unmarked memos, but put different (marked) memos on its website for distribution. Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy.

_______________________

There are SIX documents hanging on that "clothesline" in the background. Some of them appear to have real letterhead. Can someone blow them up?

120 posted on 09/13/2004 3:54:31 AM PDT by Timeout (My name is Timeout....and I'm a blogaholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson