Posted on 09/12/2004 10:18:12 PM PDT by ambrose
USA Today acknowledges that it indepedently received the documents
A lot of Talion's website in the web archive looks like it was mirrored, or stolen by, topplebush.com
"Folks have no idea of the military "culture" in 1973."
So very true. I reported for pilot training in early August 1973. I got washed out for failing my flight physical, and I was far from the only med washout in that class. There were more eliminated for medical reasons than the norm. I didn't stay around long enough to know how many washed out for flying deficiencies, but I would guess that they were much higher than in the late 60's.
They were trying to get rid of pilots and potential pilots in every possible way.
No! Your right! It's a poorly written bunch of b.s. They constantly drop lines that lead the reader to the conclusion that all is true about the charges, but always unidentified or it was reported that, and then vague about the source!
topplebush.com also conveniently is offering free excerpts of Bev Harris's book on the new voting machines.
"It is so clear the DNC and the Kerry campaign is involved in this. I suspect Carville and Begala are in on this for sure."
Agreed. As stupid as it was, its taken oxygen away from SwiftBoat Vet discussions.
Although I'm sure Kerry will find a way to stumble back into Vietnam.
Can you give us a general picture of what was said? (I'm curious because many of Bell's listeners are Libbys.)
Methinks Monday will be a very long day for See BS. Hehehe!
"Newsweek (which likes the word "discredited") has apparently begun an external investigation: it names "a disgruntled former Guard officer" as a principal source for CBS, noting "he suffered two nervous breakdowns" and "unsuccessfully sued for medical expenses."
William Safire, NYT.
Newsweak is saying that Burkett was a "principal source".
That doesn't really say much. Burkett has been trying to shop his allegations for years, with no takers. He had to have a sponsor to make it all the way to Blather's attention...
Talon News received copies from CBS by fax. They don't have the markings, so CBS at one time had, or still has, "clean" copies.
I wouldn't read anything into the address being blacked out. It was clear that CBS did that for either confidentiality or CYA reasons, but they did such a bad job of blacking the address out that it was still readable.
Rather claims this story has been in the works for years. But it Seems pretty unlikely that it would all come together some 50 days before theelection. That said, this had to be a document dump on the part of some partisan hack. Rather et al. simply couldn't contain themselves.
I'm not getting anything at talion.com
USA Today (9/13/04)Very artfully written....LOL!Document analysts differ over whether the memos..., are genuine and could have been produced by typewriters available at Ellington Air Force Base in Houston in 1972 and 1973. Two retired FBI forensic document examiners who studied the memos at USA TODAY's request said Sunday that they probably are forgeries. Four other authorities interviewed by USA TODAY, including typewriter and type font experts, said the technology existed at the time to create the documents. None of the experts consulted offered an unequivocal opinion.
USAT hired TWO forensic document examiners who said they're probably forgeries. But (then?) they interviewed four more with a different take on it. Amazing how so many media outlets are putting forth "expert" opinions WITHOUT identifying their source! I don't believe I've ever heard of such a thing.
To: Carling
>>this makes Watergate look like amateur hour.
>
>Not until the Justice Dept. gets involved.
Somebody pinch this man and wake him up.
> Methinks Monday will be a very long day for SeeBS.
Watch 'em bury it, and run wall-to-wall Ivan coverage for a straight week.
You guys need to realize something: They *have* achieved their objective in propagandizing their target audience.
-- It's the same target audience that has bought, or at least acquiesced to, their shilling of the Warren Commission Report for *forty years*. Guess who the media point-man is on the yearly anniversary journalism pieces every 11/22?
Your Boy Dan. -- That's who.
The memos were not underlined or redacted when CBS received them.
Here's a screen shot of the 60 Min II broadcast where they showed the May 19 memo...no markings. (hat tip: The Daily Recycler)
In very sloppy journalistic fashion, CBS broadcast unmarked memos, but put different (marked) memos on its website for distribution. Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy.
_______________________
There are SIX documents hanging on that "clothesline" in the background. Some of them appear to have real letterhead. Can someone blow them up?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.