To: Dog
Dan RATHER:
"This story is true. The questions we raised about then-Lieutenant Bush's National Guard service are serious and legitimate," he said, expressing confidence the memos are authentic. "Until and unless someone shows me definitive proof that they are not, I don't see any reason to carry on a conversation with the professional rumor mill." This statement will go down in history, as a last dying gasp from the Old Media.
And I don't like people impugning my pajamas.....
You don't think that guy was on the threads here with us during the Election fiasco 2000, do you? Ick, gives me the creeps!
To: A Citizen Reporter
Rather: "This story is true. The questions we raised about then-Lieutenant Bush's National Guard service are serious and legitimate," he said, expressing confidence the memos are authentic. "Until and unless someone shows me definitive proof that they are not, I don't see any reason to carry on a conversation with the professional rumor mill." Danno, you're the one dealing with irresponsible rumours and unfounded smears! "This story is true," you haughtily huff. Why? Because you say it's true? Umm...check me if I'm wrong, here, Sparky...but isn't the burden of proof on you, the accuser? Don't you have to PROVE that your forgeries ARE real, rather than make the slandered party PROVE his innocence?
65 posted on
09/10/2004 7:27:26 PM PDT by
Choose Ye This Day
("We showed weakness, and weak people are beaten."--Putin / "A more sensitive war on terror." --Kerry)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson