Really? Foster's too???
March 22, 1996
....Robert Stack: Is it possible that the experts are right? Could the "suicide" note of one of President Clinton's most trusted advisors have been forged? The implications are staggering - but only if these particular experts are correct. At least one other expert says they are not.
Marcel Matley: There is nothing in the questioned document that would support any finding of forgery. And the things that are brought forth - the apparent fragmentation - and those things are explained by the fact that we have a deteriorated copy and that fact that the man was under some emotional stress at the time.
Robert Stack: Marcel Matley is convinced that the other experts are wrong. Q1 on the left side represents the "suicide" note. K1 through K11 on the right side represents the known samples.
Marcel Matley: First is the word "the". We have three "the"s from the suicide note and three from the first known samples. You cannot tell the difference in these words. The only thing that, ah - that might be a difference is here, where it is deteriorated - this is from the photocopy that has been copied too often. The loop is gone and the stem is gone. The second word "to", we have four of them in the questioned document, one of which is where the tear is, so we can ignore it. But you notice these three "to"s have differences among them. We go to K9 and K10, we get three more words "to", we have the same differences. ..." Wow, this opens a can of worms!!!