Wow! He managed to ignore over half of the discrepancies, focused on a few and pompously claims he expected the questions, and stands by the documents.
Hm...wonder how come he did not interview the family? Why would he only interview the one person who confirmed his view.
I am astounded. An absolute lying reporter who wants to meddle in an election by falsifying the truth.
I'm way behind on this thread but this is exactly what the media have done with the Swift Boat Vet's claims. If they have 50 claims the media tries to blow up all of them by shedding doubt on a couple of details. This is how they work.
All along I have believed the whole point of Rather's lies is to push the topic into the national debate, but I never thought even he would stoop this low.