Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw
I don't know if the President has a claim, as a public figure, but I believe Killian's family could well have a claim. A news organization has an obligation to investigate in accordance with reasonable and customary standards. Those standards would be pretty high given the political climate as well as the story coming out of their NYC office. Since the documents were uncovered as forgeries within hours and since CBS deliberately spiked any voice that supported Bush, I think they could have a problem.
1,251 posted on 09/10/2004 7:47:20 PM PDT by Dolphy (Support swiftvets.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1212 | View Replies ]


To: Dolphy
In most states, public officials or figures as plaintiffs are required to prove negligence or actual malice on the part of the publisher. To prove actual malice, a person needs to show that at the time of publication or broadcast, those responsible for the story either knew it was not true or had a reckless disregarded for the truth.
See http://www.hfac.uh.edu/comm/media_libel/libel/defense.html
1,268 posted on 09/10/2004 8:12:13 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1251 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson