Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius
The only way to avoid a legal nightmare is to insist that the documents are genuine in the hope that nobody can prove conclusively otherwise.

Bingo!!

There is NO WAY to conclusively prove these are forgeries. You can speak to motive all you like, but it is still just supposition.

See-BS can simply say "the originals in our possesion were composed on a word processor, but that was done by the good Colonel himself in order to preserve his collection of hand-written personal notes (of which he had many, per his widow)".

I think this whole affair will be a lot like peeing in a dark suit: it gives you a nice warm feeling, but no one else really notices!

189 posted on 09/10/2004 1:15:58 PM PDT by liberty_lvr (Those who stand for nothing fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: liberty_lvr
There is NO WAY to conclusively prove these are forgeries.

There absolutely is.

The commander that supposedly was applying pressure to Killian retired the year before the memo was written, and Killian does not write in the past tense.

228 posted on 09/10/2004 1:24:22 PM PDT by sinkspur ("Can someone tell me where to find an ordained archpriest?"--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

To: liberty_lvr
"I think this whole affair will be a lot like peeing in a dark suit: it gives you a nice warm feeling, but no one else really notices!"

Sure am glad most here do not think like you do. Kind of sounds like some Republicans idea of "Turning the other cheek" routine. Some of us believe in fighting instead of bending over.

258 posted on 09/10/2004 1:30:56 PM PDT by JustAnAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson