Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FL_engineer; ladyjane
LadyJane pointed out she didn't think there was an IBM Selectric typewriter with proportional spacing. After searching the topic with Google she is proven correct.

Here's a quote from the lower Web address:

Although IBM had produced a successful typebar-based machine, the IBM Executive, with proportional spacing, no proportionally-spaced Selectric office typewriter was ever introduced. There was, however, a much more expensive proportionally-spaced machine called the Selectric Composer which was considered a typesetting machine rather than a typewriter.

From: http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Typewriter

Thanks for the heads up LadyJane

421 posted on 09/09/2004 9:03:02 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin

Please read #421.

Poor CBS, they really stepped into it...


422 posted on 09/09/2004 9:05:07 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies ]

To: DB
Thank you DB! Your sleuthing is much appreciated! It was so frustrating yesterday to see all the comments yesterday - on FR and in the press - saying that the Selectric was needed for proportional spacing and the th superscript could never be done on a Selectric.

Actually the opposite is true! You could get a special symbol ball for the Selectric. If you used a superscript or greek symbol a lot you could get a special ball with that symbol. You would have to change the ball to get the symbol and that was a pain in the earlier models. The later balls were somewhat easier to change.

497 posted on 09/10/2004 7:22:19 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson