To: faithincowboys
I just think it's a little premature to call these forgeries. On other threads, most of the forgery claims - e.g., the non-availability of particular fonts before a certain date - have been disputed by one or more posters.
To: Steve_Seattle
To: Steve_Seattle
OK.
So, how is CBS gonna prove they're "real" documents?
Let's see. "IF" they really have the originals, then the original writer's fingerprints would be on them, wouldn't they?
"IF" they had no originals, but only copies, they'ed be able to show "proof of transfer" or "proof of evidence" tracing them to the originals?
"IF" the originals REALLY existed, then CBS could "certainly" get them from the original source (NOW! - since their authenticity is called into question! and since they are certainly no longer a "closet secret" in "personal records" - ---> And WHY are "personal records being kept out of AF formal documentation processes?), even if at some point in time CBS "only" had copies of the original forgeries?
Just questions. Just questions.
107 posted on
09/09/2004 1:21:40 PM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Steve_Seattle
There are more problems than just the font. These FORGERIES are getting a thorough Fisking all over the internet. Go check out Captain's Quarters. Read the comments on his post regarding this CBS FORGERY story.
126 posted on
09/09/2004 2:28:08 PM PDT by
jayef
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson