[Steve_Seattle]

I just think it's a little premature to call these forgeries. On other threads, most of the forgery claims - e.g., the non-availability of particular fonts before a certain date - have been disputed by one or more posters.

[faithincowboys]

Go to Drudge.

[Robert A Cook PE]

OK.

So, how is CBS gonna prove they're "real" documents?

Let's see. "IF" they really have the originals, then the original writer's fingerprints would be on them, wouldn't they?

"IF" they had no originals, but only copies, they'ed be able to show "proof of transfer" or "proof of evidence" tracing them to the originals?

"IF" the originals REALLY existed, then CBS could "certainly" get them from the original source (NOW! - since their authenticity is called into question! and since they are certainly no longer a "closet secret" in "personal records" - ---> And WHY are "personal records being kept out of AF formal documentation processes?), even if at some point in time CBS "only" had copies of the original forgeries?

Just questions. Just questions.

[jayef]

There are more problems than just the font. These FORGERIES are getting a thorough Fisking all over the internet. Go check out Captain's Quarters. Read the comments on his post regarding this CBS FORGERY story.