Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138

Given what you say about the IBM Executive, I think that Drudge et al have gone way out on a limb and this is going to backfire bigtime.

After arguing that the documents are "clear forgeries" by Democratic operatives, how can, once they are proven genuine, their content be dismissed or even downplayed?

Clearly, the content is explosive enough (for some) to try to discredit it. This is contrary to the White House tack of saying it doesn't mean all that much.

These documents seem to have created panic in the GOP ranks, which is catapulting these documents to an even greater level of importance. We should have just argued that they are inconclusive and irrelevant.


530 posted on 09/09/2004 1:19:29 PM PDT by montrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies ]


To: montrose
I think there's a good possibility that they've been doctored, possibly just to put in an extra sentence or phrase. Some of the comments on Drudge concern the signatures -- better evidence than the proportional font stuff.
532 posted on 09/09/2004 1:22:13 PM PDT by js1138 (Speedy architect of perfect labyrinths.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson