[M1911A1]

Some of the speculation is just fun for the sake of it, at least here. I don't expect there to be a "magic bullet" discovery that proves the documents to be forgeries, anymore than I expect my study of the Seattle Mariners to improve the team, but I enjoy it.

[Law is not justice but process]

Unless someone can explain the superscript on the 111th in the second paragraph of the May 4th memo, I believe that is a smoking gun. Can you explain it? I never saw a typewriter that could do that until the electronic typewriters that came out in the 1980s.

My father got out of the USAF in 1968. EVERYTHING typed in his discharge papers was courier font and had uniform character width. Was there a great retooling of the Texas ANG between 1968 and 1972? I didn't see superscripts, even in the preprinted letterhead. Please explain.

[Rokke]

"Some of the speculation is just fun for the sake of it"

I'll buy that. I just hope people don't tie themselves too tightly in a knot over the whole issue. It just doesn't merit much thought.