Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dog

Both americas together? No way, Edwards would have nothing to do then.

I think Kerry's position, and I have given this loads of thought, is that he is for the war but he wanted to run it himself. That way he could do a war and protest it at the same time. I swear, he is the worst micromanager I ever saw. He would pester the generals to the point that they would resign or mutiny.


77 posted on 09/08/2004 6:55:02 AM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: cajungirl

I respectfully disagree with that. Effin would NEVER have invaded Iraq. The left always has their "last resort" lined up in advance. Weapons inspectors, France's refusal, and Kofi Annan. Don't forget Clinton did a huge military buildup around Iraq in '98 over the ejection of the inspectors. He was in a box, having threatened to invade. In flys Kofi Annan, meets with Saddam and declares that he "can do business with this man". Clinton is satisfied and pulls the troops out.

THAT is the path Kerry would have taken. And Saddam would still be in Baghdad, absent inspectors, joining al Queda and who knows how many more attacks we would've been subjected to.


112 posted on 09/08/2004 6:59:35 AM PDT by Timeout (My name is Timeout....and I'm a blogaholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson