Skip to comments.
Pro-Bush Booth Stirs Anger at Convention
AMERICAN MUSLIMS FOR BUSH ^
| Sep 4, 3:17 PM EDT
| RACHEL ZOLL
Posted on 09/04/2004 1:39:22 PM PDT by pilgrim
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-155 last
To: pilgrim; Travis McGee; Grampa Dave; Jeff Head; SLB
Proof that if the good muslims (?) don't give up the bad muslims they won't like how we do it.......said it long ago and they are living their dream. Let em all suffer till they learn to police themselves IMO.
![](http://www.tomeaker.com/2a/rfl_cal_bullet_460.gif )
Stay safe !
141
posted on
09/05/2004 11:27:56 PM PDT
by
Squantos
(Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
To: Squantos
Let em all suffer till they learn to police themselves IMO.
142
posted on
09/05/2004 11:30:04 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(https://www.swiftvets.com/swift/ccdonation.php?op=donate&site=SwiftVets)
To: Arizona Pard
I don't desire the death of any more than necessary to destroy the caliphate establishment attempt. But I don't have any upper bound, either. FReegards
143
posted on
09/05/2004 11:32:47 PM PDT
by
185JHP
( "The thing thou purposest shall come to pass: And over all thy ways the light shall shine.")
To: grey_whiskers
Lincoln-are you talking about the arrest warrant for Taney; suspension of habeas corpus; or what? FDR-not sure what you refer to here; please elaborate. Bush-Padilla: Are no charges filed? Or no *public* charges? I seem to recall he was accused of wanting to detonate a radioactive device -- whether improv. neutron bomb, or just conventional explosives laced with radioactive material, I don't know.Lincoln suspended Habeus Corpus and then arrested editors of newspapers that editorially opined against the war. Thousands of people spent years in jail to make the mass killing easier. Roosevelt arranged for the internment of 110 thousand Americans of Japanese decent during WW2. Both of those actions are heinous.
As to charging Jose Padilla, what do you mean my filing "public" charges? What other way is there to do it? Are you satisfied with statements made in news conferences where the accused has no opportunity at all to challenge the truth of the charges? I certainly am not satisfied with that brand of justice. That was the method used in the late unlamented Soviet Union.
BTW, as the information has leaked out over the last 2 years, there was no evidence worth the name, just rumor. Nevertheless he still sits in jail.
I am beginning to think that there is more to this. It just might be that they do not care about Padilla, they care only for the precedent. They are using this case to establish a right for random imprisonment without trial. This would be an end run around the whole due process structure that protects us and we must fight this to our last breath, whether it is intentional or just stupidity.
144
posted on
09/06/2004 6:38:00 AM PDT
by
Mike4Freedom
(Freedom is the one thing that you cannot have unless you grant it to everyone else.)
To: pilgrim
"Disgusting," said one onlooker. "Take that down," said another. Ah yes, from the same religion that doesn't decry killing of school kids in it's name? Guess we know which side you're really on, eh? Malkin's right folks!
145
posted on
09/06/2004 10:13:01 AM PDT
by
Braak
(The US Military, the real arms inspectors!)
To: Braak
Saw this morning a 'cleric' in England supported kidnapping of children!!
146
posted on
09/06/2004 10:20:09 AM PDT
by
pilgrim
To: pilgrim
So John Kerry is the mohammedan's choice for President? Let him have 'em!
147
posted on
09/06/2004 2:31:30 PM PDT
by
GOPcapitalist
("Can Lincoln expect to subjugate a people thus resolved? No!" - Sam Houston, 3/1863)
To: RockAgainsttheLeft04
It is not "a minority" of Muslims we are talking about here. The terrorists are not "bad apples", rather They have the sympathy of the vast majority of the Muslim population. The so-called moderate Muslims are the HERETICS of their religion. The insane ramblings of Mohammad himself in the Koran indicate that the murder of the infidel is a basic tenet of this so-called religion. You are absolutely right. I wish no harm upon any nonviolent mohammedan, however few they may be, and would just as soon let them go about living their lives and praying to their moon idol as much as they like so long as they don't bother me in the process. That said, I have precious little patience for the fanatical PC crowd that demands we all respect, celebrate, and incessently euphemize what is at its heart a heretical gutter regilion that celebrates violence, oppression, and conquest as its central tenets.
148
posted on
09/06/2004 2:40:48 PM PDT
by
GOPcapitalist
("Can Lincoln expect to subjugate a people thus resolved? No!" - Sam Houston, 3/1863)
To: singfreedom
"I hope you noticed that your quote could also apply to terrorists?"That was the actual application.
149
posted on
09/06/2004 3:50:55 PM PDT
by
Luis Gonzalez
( Even Jane Fonda apologized. Will you, John?)
To: Mike4Freedom
Exclude the media and keep the info away from the public domain and I'll agree to a trial. Until then - no trial because our continued existence is at stake.
150
posted on
09/06/2004 7:20:37 PM PDT
by
pacpam
(action=consequence applies in all cases)
To: Awestruck
Are comparing God to Hitler then? Because in the new testament, God told the Jews to destroy their enemies, down to every last man, woman and child, and they didn't do it.. and they were punished for it.. So I'd suggest you get off your high horse and go play kissie face with the Palestinians.
It was actually the Old Testament, it was known as "herem".
PT II
Comparing the Jews during WWII and the muslims is totally out of line. I don't recall any acts of terrorism they committed to be sentenced to death in concentration camps. On the other hand, I can enumerate ten acts of violence, globally, that can be set upon the door of muslims without breaking a sweat.
As far as adherents of islam are concerned, they follow that religion by choice. They depend upon our weakness to prevail.
To: Mike4Freedom
Once you understand the Constitution let us know as of now you don't know what the hell you are talking about.
152
posted on
09/07/2004 10:50:29 AM PDT
by
justshutupandtakeit
(My Father was 10x the hero John Fraud Kerry is.)
To: pilgrim
Deport 'em all to some sand-blasted desert...
153
posted on
09/07/2004 10:58:36 AM PDT
by
Redbob
To: pacpam
Exclude the media and keep the info away from the public domain and I'll agree to a trial. Until then - no trial because our continued existence is at stake.There are existing procedures for secret trials. The fact that they do not use it says volumes about the ethics of this administration.
Our very existence as a free nation depends on maintaining the rule of law through thick and thin. There can be no exceptions or we are just slaves at the mercy of our masters. Wake up! Bush is a tryant.
154
posted on
09/07/2004 6:46:08 PM PDT
by
Mike4Freedom
(Freedom is the one thing that you cannot have unless you grant it to everyone else.)
To: Mike4Freedom
When the rule of law is recognized and respected by all sides, I'll agree with you. Until then, I'll not grant you your premise.
155
posted on
09/07/2004 8:54:49 PM PDT
by
pacpam
(action=consequence applies in all cases)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-155 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson