To: brazzaville
Good afternoon.
"What an absurd statement to make..."
I stand by it because the original comment/post implied that Kerry joined the Navy to fight the 'powerfull' N. Vietnamese Navy. Which implies that the Navy and anyone in it did so to avoid 'true' service. That to me is a backhand at the Navy and all who served in the Navy during the Vietnam war. You can't question one sailor's valor without questioning them all - no shades of gray or situational ethics. The same goes for medals awarded and those that received them.
None of my comments come from anyone but me.
160 posted on
09/03/2004 9:35:48 AM PDT by
familyofman
(people think I'm insane because I am frowning all the time)
To: familyofman
Good morning
"You can't question one sailor's valor without questioning them all-no shades of gray or situational ethics."
Actually, in the interest of friendly inter-service rivalry I question the valor of squids on a regular basis. That doesn't impact my belief that most service people are generally preferable to leg civilians any day.
This is about john kerry and know one else.
Michael Frazier
161 posted on
09/03/2004 10:02:44 AM PDT by
brazzaville
(No surrender, no retreat. Well, maybe retreat's ok.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson