Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southflanknorthpawsis

Here's my shot at it:

1. Keyes didn't "pick" a state to represent. He was invited by the IL GOP.

2. When you say "And I do not mean compromising principles", what does that mean exactly? Maybe if an example were attached to it...

3. I've seen at least a few people on FR say they'd vote for Obama. I remember at least a few people saying they'd vote third party.

4. No, why would there be? But I think his critics' reasons for opposing him are focused far too much on disliking his personality rather than anything really substantial (issues-oriented).


113 posted on 09/02/2004 4:01:38 PM PDT by k2blader (It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: k2blader
A wise person can hold fast to his/her convictions but still remain pleasant. Controlling a temper and an ego in the thick of a battle may be difficult, but necessary if one looks for respect from many.

If Keyes were simply a pundit or private person, his words would not be so critical.

He could avoid ceding a single element of his beliefs and still remain more likeable.

I believe he prides himself in his belittling and condescension. Consequently, he will never be elected, IMO.

Because of what I see as flaws that could be overcome with reasonable effort, I question whether or not Keyes wants the victory or just the benefits of the chase.

119 posted on 09/02/2004 4:14:18 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson