Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vn_survivor_67-68

Actually, "combat V" is correct in the Navy's case-that's what they usually call it anyway. The actual nomenclature used by the Navy is "combat distinguishing device" and I believe the Army simply calls it a "V device".

The Army issues it for personal valor whereas the Navy's requirements are slightly more general--if the medal was earned "in combat" it rates a V. That's why Admiral Boorda either genuinely believed his V was earned, or maybe thought it easier to bend the rules as he believed his ship was in harm's way.

I can't see how this thing is forged...it has to be a typo.



52 posted on 09/13/2004 5:48:59 AM PDT by macp (COMBAT 'V' CORRECT TERMINOLOGY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: macp

sorry.....it is not awarded in any of the three versions of his SS citations, for which the existence of #s 2 and 3 is suspicious.....but of course one wouldn't expect to see it there, as the actual reg in the post immediately above yours shows.

Army vs Navy difference ---- based on the above re: Silver Star ---- a distinction which in no way mitigates the real issue.


53 posted on 09/13/2004 9:39:49 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson