Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SteveH
With media spotlight on the Supremes this time in a different context, the Supremes would be forced to overrule themselves and rule McC-F (for all effective purposes) unconstitutional.

One can not assume that the Supreme Court will find it unconstitutional.

132 posted on 08/26/2004 12:26:16 PM PDT by yonif ("So perish all Thine enemies, O the Lord" - Judges 5:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: yonif
One can not assume that the Supreme Court will find it unconstitutional.

Right... which may point towards an alternative Bush strategy of using this announcement as a ploy to corral the wild cowboy McCain, using his own bill (McC-F) as a lasso to stop McC from riding the open range where he is doing political damage to Bush (and other non-RINO Republicans).

I've been waiting for Bush to do this since McC stabbed him in the back by giving the mainstream media a soundbite to cover the initial impact of the first Swift Vet ad ("dishonest and dishonorable").

If McC refuses to shut the **** up, Bush finds surrogates to hammer McC for refusing to support the bill that he himself wrote and which carries his name.

135 posted on 08/26/2004 12:39:05 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson