Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez

I just saw the question there and Tribe's argument. There was that in a nutshell part that somehow concluded infringement in the form of registration, and possibly taxation was Constitutional. Tax, only if it applies to goods in general. Registration, not only implies priviledge, it undermines the purpose of the Amend. and only functions to facilitate confiscation.


426 posted on 08/25/2004 11:58:22 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets
Registration does provide the government with a readily available list of who has what, but government can tax arms under their constitutionally power to tax, and that provides the data base without infringing on the right to keep and bear.

You would have to register the arm in order for the taxes to be assessed properly, etc., so call it what you will, but it comes down to an inventory sooner or later.
429 posted on 08/26/2004 12:04:26 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (Sin Patria, pero sin amo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson