You posted a huge string of nonsense. The second amendment means exactly what it says.
In other words, Jim is asking "What part of 'shall not be infringed' don't you understand?"
I gave a summary of Laurence Tribe's argumen--before the Supreme Court I believe--when he argued in favor of gun control, and said that it wasn't the way I read the amendment at all.
So, what you're telling me is that I am crazy for disagreeing with Laurence Tribe on this isue?
Nonsense as in double speak, double talk, and clap trap. "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" is not complicated.
Only those that oppose it, try and turn it into some complicated, mysterious, mumbo jumbo, legal interpetation.