Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chad Fairbanks
Then amend the Constitution or move to a nation that requires people be allowed to own any and every weapon they may want... machine guns, bazookas, jet fighters, nukes, chemical bombs.

Or support people like Keyes who will confirm judges that respect the Second Amendment of the U S Constitution.

Incorporation of the Second is coming up, you don't want it done by Chief Justice Hillary Clinton.

240 posted on 08/25/2004 6:15:44 PM PDT by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith

I shouldn't have to amend the constitution in order to enjoy the rights in guarantees me. I fought for those rights, and I'll be damned if I see them flushed down the Toilet of POlitical Expediency".

Just because YOU would, doesn't mean I have to.


243 posted on 08/25/2004 6:17:20 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (I think the mistake a lot of us make is thinking the state-appointed shrink is our friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]

To: mrsmith; Jim Robinson; Chad Fairbanks

Every state has restricted ownership of advanced weapons since the Constitution was written, and before.
214 mrsmith

______________________________________


Doesn't make it right. Of course, they also were not states really until they actually adopted the constitution as the law of the land... THEN they got statehood.
218 -Chad-

______________________________________


mrsmith wrote: Then amend the Constitution or move to a nation that requires people be allowed to own any and every weapon they may want... machine guns, bazookas, jet fighters, nukes, chemical bombs.

______________________________________

Yes, I support the Second Amendment. And I make no bones about its purpose or to whom it applies. It was not put in place so Bill and Hillary Clinton could go duck hunting with a shotgun or so Barbara Steisand could carry a derringer in her purse to stave off overzealous fans. It's there because the founders wanted to ensure that we the people (ie, individuals) should remain armed to defend ourselves from a government gone bad.
As far as I'm concerned, we should be allowed to park fully operational Sherman tanks in our garages and commute via fighter planes (if we wish). Now, personal nukes capable of taking out large cities.... hmmmm.... I don't know if I want to trust some of the crazier antiwar libs with those.

1,219 posted on 04/17/2003 5:04 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

______________________________________


Well said JR.

I am curious though on how you see the 'States right', - claimed by Calif, - to prohibit assault weapons.

As Chad mentioned above, territories of the US, prior to statehood, did not have a right to infringe upon the 2nd.
Mrsmith claims they did, as do many Keyes supporters. How say you?


384 posted on 08/25/2004 9:29:58 PM PDT by tpaine (No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another. - T. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson