[Chad Fairbanks]

As an NRA member, I think it is perfectly reasonable to vet a candidate's second amendment positions.

In the articles published today it APPEARS he has changed his poition somewhat (and in a way I consider dangerous and unconstitutional)...

I am a reasonable man, and if it appears this way to ME, then it must to many others as well. He needs to clarify this issue ASAP, in my humble opinion. If he doesn't, then it's not just bad for him, but bad for all of us in general.

[Robert_Paulson2]

As an NRA member, I think it is perfectly reasonable to vet a candidate's second amendment positions.

---

and it will be...
the silence from the NRA and GOA will be deafening... unless Alan gets this one nailed and buried.

He should do it asap. This is one issue we cannot afford to "take away" from the dems... as a national party.

[SJackson]

As an NRA member, I think it is perfectly reasonable to vet a candidate's second amendment positions...In the articles published today it APPEARS he has changed his poition somewhat (and in a way I consider dangerous and unconstitutional)...

We disagree on his "position change", based on a one liner from a Sun Times reporter.

BTW, Obama's record is just as well established, start with a ban on the sale and transfer of all semi-automatic weapons for starters, you get to keep them for now.

And he's not running for the Illinois legislature any more, rather a Senator, so those laws will apply to us all, not just Illinois. On this issue, there's no choice.