Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson
I support it 100%, too, as do you.

Here is what Keyes supports:

Keyes said he supports a system in which guns would be treated similarly to automobiles, with people being required to undergo different levels of training before they would be allowed to own and carry various sorts of weapons.

Nowhere in the Constitution does it say anything about requiring training, in order to get "Permission" to bear arms. What it say is that the right shall not be infringed.

SOunds like he supports it maybe 75 percent. (which is still more than Obama, though)

124 posted on 08/25/2004 5:12:16 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (I think the mistake a lot of us make is thinking the state-appointed shrink is our friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: Chad Fairbanks
Are those his words or some reporter's words? Was Keyes promoting anything other than the actual second amendment and the meaning intended by the founding fathers:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

139 posted on 08/25/2004 5:23:15 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson