Posted on 08/25/2004 2:09:41 PM PDT by yonif
(Alan Keyes) On U.S. interventionism in the world:Does this mean that Keyes is against the war in Iraq?I would want to renounce the idea that we have the right to interfere, in an aggressive way, with the affairs of other [nations]. I think we can play a constructive role in trying to bring about diplomatic solutions in different parts of the world, but I do not believe that when our ideas are rejected, we should resort to war in order to force people to accept a deal that's dictated on our terms.
Shhhhhhhhhhh...I only BTTTed that to have a record of where Keyes stands.
Sorry...
Just sit still and don't bump it for a little bit, at least until it drops out of "Latest Posts".
:0(
I think that the man speaks in such complexities that it's often easy to see in his words what one hopes (or fears) to see.
That is one aspect in which I agree with thouse who say he's less than an ideal candidate. The straightforwardness is refreashing and desperatly needed...the tendency to say in 60 words what he could say in 16 can sometimes be a handicap.
LOL!!
You mean sort of what happened to me when Jim read my response to your asking me to provide you with my interpretation of "well regulated"?
Keyes has said he supports the war as a valid front in the war on terrorism but that he opposes the retroactive rhetoric used by many Republicans to redefine it as a mission of "liberation" and a defacto exercises in nation building.
In other words, the war was a good thing - for OUR purposes - NOT for IRAQ'S purposes. which is what the "nation building" fallacy implies...that we are going about meddling in folks affairs "for there own good."
The liberation of Iraq, and the subsequent "nation building" came about as a consequence of taking action "for our own good".
What is wrong with pointing out the positive consequences of selfish actions (for our own good). And while we are at it, I am willing top make a gentleman's wager that we will "nation build" in Iraq for one tenth as long as we remained in Germany.
Iraq is a base, a beach head, and a target.
That's always been my take. It had the salient combination of being both the most strategic target and the one most readily offering us justification for going in.
I don't think anyone is saying that it's wrong to say "oh by the way, look at the folks we liberated" or even to allow that to be assumed as our mission if it's the only way we can politically sell a necessary mission. What I was saying about Keyes is that he doesn't actually believe that it was an exercises in that sort of meddling, thus he supports it - and when confronted with the seeming contradiction in the nation building rhetoric and his previous statements, he's forced to point out that the nation-building rhetoric is confusing the issue of why we went.
I am technically a 'neocon' so I support intervention in the middle east... big time. If words mean things... it sounds like he thinks we should have other priorities.
"Iraq is a base, a beach head, and a target."
I have been told and read that a major issue now is force projection (air power), and having land facilities to do so, since carriers are quickly becoming vulnerable to conventional anti-ship weapons(I cannot recall the sun-what missile that goes at mach 4 or whatever)....CMIIAW, but I don't think we ever actually put carriers in the persian gulf during the iraq invasion for this reason.
Jim, Alan Keyes is on my prayer list and I am actively writing letters to the editor on behalf of his campaign. I am a Christian woman, a constitutionalist--and write my representatives constantly on the oath they took to uphold the constitution.
We should expect no less from our elected representatives but for some reason they have strayed from the original values and concepts. I guess we turned a blind eye and look what happened! Now we have to literally beat them back into their constitutional cages and start electing guys like Keyes. IMHO, his time has come, God Bless that man. He has a tremendous fight ahead.
Does anyone know about him when he was Ambassador Keyes to the UN under Reagan? I'd be interested in any stories on that.
John Ellis "Jeb" Bush is the 43rd and current Governor of Florida. He was elected in November 1998 and re-elected in November 2002, becoming the first Republican in the state's history to be re-elected as Governor. He is the younger brother of President George W. Bush, older brother of Neil Bush, and second son of former President George H. W. Bush.
Bush was born February 11, 1953, in Midland, Texas. He graduated Phi Beta Kappa with a bachelor's degree in Latin American Affairs from the University of Texas at Austin in 1973.
He has been married to Columba Garnica Gallo since 1974 and has three children, George P., Noelle and Jeb Jr. Jeb Bush speaks Spanish and English.
His first position in public service was as Florida's secretary of Commerce between 1987 and 1988 under Florida governor Bob Martinez...
Luis, can you believe the Florida GOP lowered themselves to running a carpetbagging TEXAN for Governor of FLORIDA? His WHOLE family is in Texas, was it was Jeb failed to get elected to ANY office in his home state? Was the Flordia GOP so DESPERATE that they couldn't find ANYONE from Florida to run in 1994? Millions of native Flordians are NONE of them were qualified? I mean Florida is the 4th largest state, just beating out in Illinois. I guess the Florida GOP is even more pathetic than the ILGOP.
Well Luis, it's bad the rest of the state didn't follow your lead and vote for Buddy McKay, a LIFELONG Floridian. At least you're consistant in your hatred of carpetbaggers that you were willing to support Democrat McKay, right? It's such an embarrassment that the current Governor probably can't even find Miami-Dade on a map, eh Luis? (oh and the fact he ran statewide in Florida numerous times before doesn't count -- certainly didn't count with the current GOP Senate nominee in Illinois)
Ah, don't worry, you can switch to the RAT party and help oust the Diaz-Balart . Did you know their whole family, including their grandfather, father, and uncle served in the CUBAN legislature before Castro took over? The nerve of these guys to CARPETBAG it to Florida and take a seat that RIGHTFULLY belonged to a native Florida resident! You CERTAINLY wouldn't tolerate a guy who's family held posts in Maryland running for an Illinois seat, so we all know you'll hold the Balart family to the same standard and DEMAND they head back to Cuban and run for the family's TRADITIONAL seat.
After all, you're not a hypocrite, right Luis?
Jeb Bush moved to Florida in 1981, entered State politics in 1987, and was elected to the office of Governor in 1998. He had lived in Florida seventeen years by then.
If you can't see the difference between the two, you're dumber than dirt.
Re: post #490.
Jim, do you think this type of graphic is appropriate for your site?
Far more appropriate than the Keyes bashing.
Regarding deleted posts 490 and 497, I guess the Keyes bashers are losing the argument. BTW, the graphic at post 490 has appeared on this forum several times and, until now, has not been deleted that I'm aware of.
I submit it was no more offensive than the Keyes bashing posts, and therefore should not have been deleted before all those posts are, IMHO.
you haven't really won an argument until your posts start disappearing...you know you won, because they're all hitting the abuse button on your posts.
You lose, Luis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.