To: COEXERJ145
Yes, but it can go too far the other way, too. Remember on 9/11, when CNN was claiming a possible "Navigational malfunction"
after the
second plane hit WTC ?
I understand caution, no one wants to look like one of those who jumped to the conclusion of muslim terrorists at OKC , yet it's just as silly to look like CNN on 9/11.
335 posted on
08/24/2004 3:57:53 PM PDT by
Warren_Piece
(Just thinkin' about women and glasses of beer.)
To: Warren_Piece
Anyone claiming it was an accident after the second plane hit the WTC was either misinformed or being stupid. It was obvious to everyone watching that it was a terrorist attack. Hell, I was the first to say on Airliners.net that a second plane had hit the second tower and that it had to be a terrorist attack.
345 posted on
08/24/2004 4:01:42 PM PDT by
COEXERJ145
(I Annoy Buchananites)
To: Warren_Piece
OKC, it was those pesky eyewitnesses that saw Mid Eastern men with the lily whites that took the fall by themselves.
See Jana Davis.
Some people here don't believe what they see and because they have that problem, they want to project it on all of us.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson