You arguments are all spurious concerning the supposed "legality" of lesbianism...the law is the law and your humorous attempts at raising legal technicalities remind me of Clinton's famous answer, "It depends on what the meaning of "is" is..."
You must have been getting stoned during this part of government class: a ruling by SCOTUS is not a "technicality." If SCOTUS rules that activity X is protected by the Constitution, then a NC or VA or NY law that bans activity X is null and void.
Was that so hard?