Replies

>>"That makes sense. Any guy who gets off watching other guys is sick," he said.<<

Um, yeah. Being attracted to the sexuality of your own gender is called homosexuality. It's natural for heterosexuals to be revulsed at it. At the same time, heterosexuals are attracted to the sexuality of women. Faux-lesbian displays allow a man to observe the sexual behavior of women without having to be revulsed by simultaneously observing the sexual behavior of another man.

Further, parenting (in the biological sense) requires an investment on the part of the male: the care of a pregnant mate and the children. If that investment is expended on a relationship with no genetic ties to the male, that male will lose an opportunity to pass on his genes. IOW, it jeopardizes his genetic survival. Hence, there is a biological revulsion to promiscuity which is unique to males. (Females know that they are the mother of whatever offspring they have, so this revulsion is less.)

Even after the natural biological ends of these revulsions and attractions are perverted by a grossly artificial situation, the attractions often remain.

Hence, observing Lesbianism allows males to experience the stimulation of observing females in sexual activity, without the revulsion of homosexuality or, strange as it sounds, female promiscuity.

Women, don't believe me? James Bond is a total man-whore. Yet his promiscuity INCREASES his attractiveness to women. Contrarily, women depicted as promiscuous traditionally have lost appealed. (although, nowadays, the promise that a woman will be seen having sex in the next scene has over-ridden this revulsion.) I mean, seriously, how many men would watch a well-clothed Brittney Spears or Madonna or Christine Aguilera for more than five minutes? And don't be confused by characterizations of women who act sex-driven, but too good for their male companions, like Lara Croft: the turn-off isn't behaving sex driven (that's stimulating), but the actual act of having promisucuous sex.

Please also note that these describe human motivations at their most base and animalistic. I'm most certainly not insisting that this is what "all men really want." higher motibations can be sincere. I'm just stating the base way we are programmed as animals prior to the divine spark of reason and charity.