[Beckwith]

So, you're not going to vote because there is no Libertarian candidate. I assume you're OK with that?

If you don't support Bush, Kerry could win. I assume you're OK with that?

Do you have any idea how absurd your position is?

By not voting Bush, your personal goals will take a giant, giant step backward.

[Mike4Freedom]

So, you're not going to vote because there is no Libertarian candidate. I assume you're OK with that?

There IS a Libertarian candidate. His name is Michael Badnarik and I certainly will vote for him. He is the only non-socialist candidate on my states ballot. Do you have a non-socialist candidate on your state ballot other than Badnarik?

If you don't support Bush, Kerry could win. I assume you're OK with that?.

What difference does it make. Socialist A (Bush) will continue the war, re-start the draft, spend my money like a drunken sailor and lock up people without charge or trial. He has and will spit on the constitution.

Socialist B (Kerry) will continue the war, re-start the draft (for public service), spend my money like a drunken sailor and spit on the constitution.

It is a waste of a vote to vote for either of them.