Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Should Bush Respond to Kerry on the Swiftvets Issue?

Posted on 08/19/2004 3:09:04 PM PDT by AJFavish

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Sgt. Pile E-6
"For his whole life John Kerry has been slandering veterans, today Kerry keeps with tradition slandering honorably discharged veterans. Slandering veterans, calling them war criminals, and liars has been the only consistent stance Kerry has taken in his whole life."

Great statement but NOT the right thing for Bush to say. That's what John O'Neill and the Swifties should say.

The Swifties are men of great courage and conviction. They WILL NOT be silenced as they are speaking for millions of us who were smeared by that bastard Hanoi John!

This is a veterans matter, not a presidential matter. It should have been done many, many, years ago!

21 posted on 08/19/2004 3:21:04 PM PDT by Chieftain (Support the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and expose Hanoi John's FRAUD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
I think the rule of thumb is that when a campaign opponent is self-destructing like this you just stay out of the way.

Consider that which Kerry has already admitted to be a lie - his Christmas in Cambodia charade & consider how that reflects on his mental condition.

22 posted on 08/19/2004 3:21:05 PM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

If he says anything at all, he should state that he is not interested in impinging on the First Amendment rights of these veterans.


23 posted on 08/19/2004 3:21:11 PM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

Bush should continue to say nothing on the issue. Strategery is at work here. Kerry has already locked himself into having to endorse or repudiate the ads of the 527 groups that support him, while W doesn't, since he is making a blanket condemnation of ALL 527s.


24 posted on 08/19/2004 3:21:56 PM PDT by ambrose (Kerry is endorsed by the Communist Party USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

I believe the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform Act expressly forbids any coordination between a candidate and a 527.


25 posted on 08/19/2004 3:24:24 PM PDT by airborne (Death From Above)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

Bush already responded to a question about the ads on Larry King's show. He doesn't need to make any other comments about it.


26 posted on 08/19/2004 3:26:17 PM PDT by mass55th (We are The Knights Who Say "Ni!" No! Not The Knights Who Say "Ni!" The same!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnfrink

Why do you say that? W released his records and the discussion of that subject immediately disappeared. Now one only hears the odd charge in passing. No one seriously makes the accusations anymore. Kerry would ultimately benefit if he signs that form 180. Even if the info is all bad for him the problem will be old news in a week or two. It's holking it back that keeps it all going. Nixon learned that. Clinton knew it. Clinton refined the practice of "document dumps" and was able to release tons of information on Friday that was old news by Monday.


27 posted on 08/19/2004 3:26:47 PM PDT by ThanhPhero (Ong la nguoi di hanh huong den La Vang)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

I will not participate in the illegal campaign activities no matter how stronger urged by the democrats!


28 posted on 08/19/2004 3:29:35 PM PDT by School of Rational Thought (Republican - The thinking people's party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
That's my thought. This is between the Vietnam vets involved. Put the two groups on the same footing, but don't get involved. Debating war records is a no-win for W.
29 posted on 08/19/2004 3:30:49 PM PDT by colorado tanker (shove it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: smonk
The point is Kerry is demanding that Bush denounce these veterans. The media is beginning to carry this story as poor Kerry being defamed. That is being hung around Bush's neck.

I doubt Bush will touch this and that could be prudent, but I think the dems and media will turn this into a liability for Bush. Here is my suggested presidential statement.

(President Bush): I have never questioned Senator Kerry's service in Vietnam and I am not going to start now. However, a group of hundreds of Senator Kerry's fellow veterans have formed an organization which has criticized both his behavior during and after the war. Senator Kerry has asked me, even demanded, that I denounce these veterans. As I have not criticized Senator Kerry with respect to his Vietnam service, nor am I going to denounce hundreds of combat veterans for expressing their views. I would like to remind Senator Kerry that he is the only candidate in this race to criticize the other's military service. Senator Kerry has responded to questions about his own record by criticizing mine. I ask that Senator Kerry apologize for those remarks, and I repeat my pledge not to criticize the Senator's military record. Finally, prominent supporters of Senator Kerry have made intemperate remarks calling me a "deserter" and Vice President Cheney a "coward." This type of angry name calling is not appropriate during a time of war, or at any time, and I hope that Senator Kerry will also disavow such comments, which he knows to be untrue.

30 posted on 08/19/2004 3:33:09 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: johnfrink

Yup, that's for sure...it would be really embarassing for the LIES that the left has been telling..."he was AWOL" etc....to be proven to be LIES AGAIN!!!

We seem to forget that President BUSH did report for duty in Alabama, he requested and was GRANTED time off to work for a campaign...he did not HAVE TO TAKE a flight physical because his UNIT WAS BEING SHUT DOWN...I really hate it when the FACTS get in the way...

G


31 posted on 08/19/2004 3:34:29 PM PDT by GRRRRR (Love America? VOTE REPUBLICAN!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

an awesome reply would be this: "John Kerry exercised his first-amendment right to protest against the Vietnam War. I think it is unfair for John Kerry to deny his fellow Vietnam veterans the opportunity to protest against something they also strongly believe in. Censorship is not the American way."


32 posted on 08/19/2004 3:34:33 PM PDT by ghost of nixon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
Kerry needs to be appreciative for all the coverage his one dimensional campaign is getting.
What better publicity for Kerry's key claim to a presidency.
Kerry started to re-fight the Vietnamese war, he now has a golden opportunity to justify and proof his presidential capabilities in full view of the electorate from here on in all the way to the elections.
It would help him of course by finally releasing his full military records.
33 posted on 08/19/2004 3:37:10 PM PDT by hermgem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

John Kerry has ridiculed my National Guard service and has stated that I'm not qualified to question his Vietnam service and now he'd have me, a stateside National Guard pilot during that time, to condemn hundreds of war vets and says I should somehow forbid them from telling their story.


34 posted on 08/19/2004 3:37:51 PM PDT by Jim_Curtis (Liberals lie at the premise, accept their premise and you can only lose the argument.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

Bush should make a big show of signing a Form 180.

Just to show John Kerry how it is done.


35 posted on 08/19/2004 3:38:35 PM PDT by coconutt2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

Rush brought up earlier that since it is a 527 group, President Bush may have to take a hands off approach, or violate campaign finance laws if he addresses a specific one.


36 posted on 08/19/2004 3:38:37 PM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult ("I hate going to places like Austin and Dubuque to raise large sums of money. But I have to," Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

I like your response.


37 posted on 08/19/2004 3:38:54 PM PDT by Wphile (Keep the UN out of Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Williams

good quote :)


38 posted on 08/19/2004 3:39:01 PM PDT by Sgt. Pile E-6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: federal

I agree. Bush should avoid getting involved but should point out that the Vets have been going after Kerry in protests since long before he was even governor of Texas and that they are not only republicans but also democrats who are Vietnam Vets against Kerry.


39 posted on 08/19/2004 3:39:33 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002 (http://jednet207.tripod.com/PoliticalLinks.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
How Should Bush Respond ?

He shouldn't. He's not making the alegations, his fellow vets are.

40 posted on 08/19/2004 3:39:58 PM PDT by ChadGore (Vote Bush. He's Earned It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson