Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: babyface00

This article is nothing but hogwash. Consumption taxes would not have to get anywhere close to 30% or 50%. That is a pure fallacy.

The increased cost (inflation) would be offset by an overwhelming increase in salaries and wages due to the elimination of federal taxes deducted.

The consumption tax creates a system of transparency where you take home what you earn (without hidden deductions or employer contributions) and you know exactly how much of each purchase is going to the federal gov't.

This will lead to a reduced need for accountants (perhaps this author's motivation) and an increased interest and scrutiny of federal budgets.


12 posted on 08/18/2004 6:05:41 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (9-11 is your Peace Dividend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Erik Latranyi
This article is nothing but hogwash. Consumption taxes would not have to get anywhere close to 30% or 50%. That is a pure fallacy.

Actually Linder's 23% tax is close to 30% (29.87%) ...His tax is 23% "of the gross payment".

$129.87 (gross payment) minus 23%(of the gross payment) = $100.00...but that would only be the law for the first year because after that SS "determines" the rate to suit their needs.

46 posted on 08/18/2004 7:53:21 AM PDT by lewislynn (Why do the same people who think "free trade" is the answer also want less foreign oil dependence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson