Posted on 08/17/2004 8:14:17 PM PDT by PropertyRightsResearch.org
Sheriff Warns Hage of Possible Cattle Confiscation and Arrest
August 17, 2004
Nevada Live Stock Association
For Immediate Release
Contact: Ramona Morrison 775.424.0570 rhmorrison@sbcglobal.net
Nye County, Nevada - According to Nye County Sheriff, Tony DeMeo, the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management (BLM), in the midst of finalizing post-trial briefs in a thirteen-year old lawsuit with Nye County rancher, Wayne Hage, and in a move of apparent direct defiance of the several recent court decisions, are preparing to confiscate Hages cattle on his ranch in Nye County, Nevada. Hage was notified Friday, August 13, 2004, by Sheriff DeMeo, that Bob Abbey, Nevada BLM Director, had told him that, despite ongoing litigation, the BLM could move forward with the confiscation unless they receive a cease and desist order from the Court.
Alf Brandt, Interior Department Solicitor, and one of the Governments attorneys in the May Hage v. U.S. compensation trial in Reno, Nevada stated in a July 30, 2004, letter to Sheriff DeMeo that the, BLM actions may result in Mr. Hages appearance in federal court, which may provide him the opportunity to again present his legal theories and allow the federal court to adjudicate these issues. Brandts letter also contained thinly veiled threats to arrest Hage.
Thursday, the U.S. Forest Service hand-delivered a three-day notice to Hage to remove livestock from the lands the U. S. Court of Federal Claims determined in its 2002 Final Decision and Finding of Fact to be fee lands to which Hage holds title. (Fee means the inheritable right to use.)
Sheriff DeMeo commented on the governments actions, It is inexplicable to me why, after thirteen years of litigation, the BLM and Forest Service seem so anxious to go after Hage now. But there definitely seems to be an intensity building in this county and I expect them to try something. I have instructed my deputies to protect Constitutional rights of the citizens of Nye County, even if the perpetrator is the federal government, he added.
Concerned about a Ruby Ridge-style government arrest, today, Hage forwarded a letter to Sheriff DeMeo stating that he believes the governments efforts to create a confrontation with him is a move of desperation on the part of the agencies as a result evidence that surfaced at his trial in Reno in May.
The U.S. Forest Service, BLM, and southern Nevada water interests were implicated in a conspiracy, according to court transcripts, to bankrupt the Hages in order to obtain the abundant Pine Creek Ranch water for the benefit of Southern Nevada interests.
In his letter, Hage stated that, ....I believe Alf W. Brandt, as solicitor for the BLM Department of Interior, would like to find a way to eliminate me at the hands of some (federal) Law Enforcement personnel.
In the thirteen-year Fifth Amendment of the Constitution takings lawsuit in the U. S. Court of Federal Claims between the Hage family and the federal government, Hage has prevailed in all court rulings to date.
In 1991, the federal government, in an attempt to derail Hages civil takings case, attempted to prosecute him for destruction of government property. The case was reversed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Nevada Live Stock Association Director, Ramona Morrison, remarked about the May trial. The governments case faltered dramatically during the compensation trial. Every government witness was roundly impeached or discredited during cross examination. Facing the potential of incurring enormous damages in a ruling expected after the October closing arguments in Reno -- and numerous takings cases brought by other ranchers who have found themselves in similar circumstances as Hage -- the U. S. Forest Service and BLM have little chance at damage control. They may be acting in desperation to intimidate other ranchers from similar attempts to seek compensation when federal government takes their property.
Government Solicitor, Alf Brandt, justifies his actions in his letter to Sheriff DeMeo by stating that Hage is failing to keep his cattle on the forage of the 50-foot right-of-ways. Hage commented from his ranch, The government argues that I must contain my cattle on 50 feet of either side of my 1866 ditch rights-of-ways, some of which are natural creeks. I defy anyone to show me where the Court has said that in any of the three published Decisions or in the one court Order. Yet this is their justification for seeking my arrest. The government refuses to recognize that I am not a trespasser on my own ranch.
# # # # #
Contacts:
Tony DeMeo, Nye County Sheriff 775.751.7000 www.nyecountysheriff.net
Ramona Morrison 775.424.0570 rhmorrison@sbcglobal.net
Wayne Hage 775.482.4187
Ladd Bedford, Esq., Attorney for Hage 415.905.0200
Nevada Live Stock Association
9732 State Route 445, #305
Sparks, NV 89436
775.424.0570
Fax: 775.424.0571
rhmorrison@sbcglobal.net
Note from Kathy Van Tuyl: Remember, folks ... these are President Bush's Secretaries of Agriculture, of Interior, and his Attorney General. He apparently has no more control over them now than he did four years ago, and I haven't heard him talk about doing anything about them. Should we give him another four years?
To be fair, I doubt he even knows this is going on ... although you can bet his cabinet members do. And since their actions do truly endanger this nation and her citizens, AND, after all, don't these threatened actions by USFS and BLM constitute "paper terrorism" as defined by the Patriot Act ... I ask that you join me in demanding President Bush defend us against this kind of terrorism here at home ... NOW! This is a real and imminent danger ... and he can stop it with a phone call!
Let's see what a few thousand of us can accomplish! Please be respectful but firm. There is plenty of useful information in the Nevada Live Stock Association press release with which to construct your letter.
Federal Citizen Information Center - Email addresses for the Bush Administration http://www.pueblo.gsa.gov/call/e-mail.htm 1-800-FED-INFO (1-800-333-4636)
President George Bush president@whitehouse.gov 1-202-456-1414 1-202-456-1111 1-888-552-9406 (non-working in parts of the country) Fax: 1-202-456-2883 or 202-456-2461
Secretary Ann Veneman Ann.Veneman@usda.gov 1-202-720-3631 1-866-632-9992 Veda Patterson 202-260-1026 Fax: 1-202-720-2166
U.S. Forest Service Chief Dale Bosworth dbosworth@fs.fed.us 1-202-205-1661 Fax: 1-202-205-1765 U.S. Forest Service, 202-205-8421, Deputy Office, Kathleen Clemens
U.S. Forest Service Regional Forester, Region 4, Jack Troyer jtroyer@fs.fed.us 1-801-625-5605 Fax: 1-801-625-5359
Secretary of [the Department of] Interior Gale Norton gale_norton@ios.doi.gov 1-202-208-7351 or 1-202-208-6416 1-202-208-3100 (information and employee locator number) Fax: 1-202-208-3144, 202-208-6956 or 1-202-273-3501 [Harold] Craig Manson, Assistant Secretary for Fish & Wildlife and Parks 1-202-208-5347 craig_manson@ios.doi.gov
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Director, Kathleen Clarke (Greg) Kathleen_Clarke@blm.gov 1-202-208-6731 or 1-202-452-5125 Fax: 1-202-452-5124
BLM State Director (Nevada), Robert Abbey babbey@nv.blm.gov 1-775-861-6590 Fax: 1-775-861-6601
Attorney General John Ashcroft AskDOJ@usdoj.gov 1-202-353-1555 or Main Switchboard 1-202-514-2000 Fax: 1-202-307-6777
Could this be why the federal agencies won't leave Wayne Hage alone? Please read and consider that this 'trail' passes through Private Land and that often the private landowner is not even told about the existence of this 'trail'
It seems that the American Discovery Trail (ADT), "The nation's first coast-to-coast, non-motorized recreation trail", passes right by (or through?) Wayne Hage's Pine Creek Ranch in Nye County, Nevada. http://www.discoverytrail.org/states/nevada/nv_points4.html
ADT's home page: "Stretching across more than 6,800 miles and 15 states, the ADT is the only coast-to-coast, non-motorized recreational trail. Linking communities, cities, parks and wilderness, the ADT allows people to hike, bike or ride horses for an afternoon or a cross-country adventure." The first "national discovery trail" long-distance trail. http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/archives/105cong/parks/pks97mtg.htm Originally described as being 6,000 miles in length -- from Cape Henlopen State Park in Delaware to Point Reyes National Seashore in California -- it has expanded by over 800 miles in less than seven years. http://www.discoverytrail.org/index.html
The ADT website is supported by the Coleman Company and the Lipton Company: http://www.Coleman.com and http://www.Lipton.com . See more sponsors: http://www.discoverytrail.org/sponsors/index.html -- including DeLorme http://www.DeLorme.com
"About Us" and "Mission": http://www.discoverytrail.org/about/index.html
See the list of Board of Directors: http://www.discoverytrail.org/about/staff.html
info@discoverytrail.org
This researched information sent to you by Julie Kay Smithson propertyrights@earthlink.net www.PropertyRightsResearch.org (Have you visited lately? Family safe, educational and empowering, regularly updated.)
If we all act now, we can maybe avoid a big confrontation and all that goes with it.
I' like to see her run for Governor here in Idaho or in Nevada. Here in Idaho, she would have HUGE support.
Thanks for all you do, Jeff.
Thanks as well to the propertyrights .org people.
Regards,
Thanks for all you do, Jeff.
Thanks as well to the propertyrights .org people.
Regards,
Thanks for all you do, Jeff.
Thanks as well to the propertyrights .org people.
Regards,
Thanks for all you do, Jeff.
Thanks as well to the propertyrights .org people.
Regards,
You, sir, are an ass.
Maybe your handle should have been Quadruple?
Thanks for the ping!
Please use the links/contaacts in post 53 to contact these people and demand they desist.
Send the same to your email lists. Prhaps we can nip this one in the bud.
I cited the article, which contains a quote from the sheriff. I don't have any other info than this article, although I suppose a web search on his name would be productive.
The following are the violations of law by the BLM........
By virtue of IBLA (INTERIOR BOARD OF LAND APPEALS) decision Ray Rothbard, 137 IBLA 159 (1996)
"The B.L.M. lacked authority to issue a notice to cease and desist mining operations under 43 CFR 3809.3-2, because such action required an appropriate court order, which had not been obtained."
These are the civil rights violations they have NOT been prosecuted for: 42 USC 1983, deprivation of civil rights 42 USC 1985, conspiracy to interfere with civil rights 42 USC 1986, action for neglect to prevent abuse 42 USC 1987, prosecution for violations of civil laws 18 USC 241, conspiracy against civil rights 18 USC 242, deprivation of rights under color of law 18 USC 1341, Mail Fraud 18 USC 152, knowingly making false declarations 18 USC 1001, knowingly submitting false statements 18 USC 1962(d), conspiracy 31 USC 3802, liability for false claims and statements 43 CFR 20.735, fraud or fraudulent statements
It's important to understand that they are using a process against you in order to gain jurisdiction in this matter. Believe it or not, everything they've probably sent to you by virtue of notices, letters, etc. are all "offers of contract" . If those offers are not rejected within a certain amount of time, you've gone into "dishonor" and the "dispute" begins.
Also, it's critical to put the bureaucrat/gov't agent on official notice that he must establish his basis for intruding into your commercial affairs without your consent and this is big.....in order for his notice to have validity he must send it UNDER PENALTIES OF PERJURY (26 USC 6065) which they will NOT do because it leaves them personally liable. In Tx. some of the legal reform groups are stopping attorney's, code enforcers, etc. dead in their tracks because they understand the "adminstrative" rules and procedures used by the gov't at all levels to gain control over our affairs.
Politics enter when the BLM has to use a source of their aggregate in a residential area where they claim to the public we have to use this source as there are no others. Which is bull since they KNOW of this land but to save themselves money by using a source closer to where they need to use it. We are talking about a 1000 acre deposit which is 20 feet thick (as tested already), so there are many millions involved here and I am like some bug they just want to SQUASH !!!! at the time I was in my 6th year as Little League President and we built 2 baseball fields out of land donated by the govt so they certainly knew me and my positive intentions, many could have been employed here.
Old government tactic: If they can't beat you in court, financially ruin you. The bureaucrats behind things like this are the ones who should be arrested.
MM
It is disapointing that all this takes place all the time. I was recently visiting the Steens Mountains in Eastern Oregon and due to a Clinton Exec. Order they have sealed off the entire range from humans. All the 4WD roads are closed, and supposedly they sit in some ranger station glassing for violators. The Steens are one of the most remote sections of the USA, hard to get to. What ever harm was being caused by the very few people using dirt roads in the park is largely in the immagination of our masters. None the less I think they confiscate your vehicle if they catch you there (proportionality for you).
It is sad that Bush has not reversed any of this. The Steens could be "undone" as a National Monument or have the Wilderness Designation changed by executive order.
But it doesn't work that way. Democratic administrations tighten the chains that bind us, Republican ones let us get used to them at their current tightness.
They now have "wilderness study area" signs up in the adjoining desert, another fun place to explore. Expect they will close that soon too. Can't have tire tracks in the sand!!
It's gonna take something a lot bigger than a second Bush term to fix the fundamental problems in our country. In fact I increasingly think we can't / won't fix it and we'll just be "the boiled frog".
Anyway, time to write more letters. Jeff, thanks for the ping. I've added the CW II ping list.
No, but she does. LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.