To: ConservativeStLouisGuy
Your work on Capitol Hill paid off; after all, the funding received strong bipartisan support -- so strong that in the United States Senate, only 12 members voted against the funding, two of whom were my opponent and his running mate. (Applause.)When pressed, he explained his vote -- "I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it." (Laughter.) He went on to say he was proud of the vote, and the whole thing is a "complicated" matter. There's nothing complicated about supporting our troops in combat. (Applause.)
Cut. Print up 10,000 copies. Distribute as next television spot, nationwide. :)
16 posted on
08/16/2004 11:39:20 AM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I concur -- W put the contrast between he and Lurch into VERY SIMPLE terms that anyone with a brain can understand -- without having to resort to the hate-mongering that Dems employ these days without abandon. Here's hoping that sound
reasoning will prevail....more more uplifing news regarding the 2004 election, click on this link:
Bush seen gaining in key states
Original article:
Bush seen gaining in key states(Washington Times)
FReegards....
17 posted on
08/16/2004 12:01:46 PM PDT by
ConservativeStLouisGuy
(11th FReeper Commandment: Thou Shalt Not Unnecessarily Excerpt)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson