[wasnova]

In case anyone doesn't know better; writing "killed" in a warning-sign like this is a very very bad idea.

If this guy were to kill anyone, he'd be charged with murder, bet on it.

The "will be killed" denotes an intent/desire to kill - and that insures a charge of murder.

Much better to write something like "property defended with firearms."

This guy does have the right to defend himself and his family with a firearm; but definitely does Not have the right to "kill treaspassers."

[TaxRelief]

Much better to write something like "property defended with firearms."

Our Judicial Oligarchy has forced people to believe that they must mince words to avoid prosecution if they are involved in an incident. The intent here is to make it clear that this guy is defending his property.

He wants to make sure any idiot gets the point, not just people with a sixth grade reading ability.

[don-o]

Buck a funch of PC BS.

I salute the man for giving fair warning.

Last I heard, in court, you can be convicted of shooting an intruder, unless your life was in danger. If you could run out the back door, or climb out a window, you need to let the perp have his way.

I will guarantee, if this good 'ol boy pops a cap on somebody who he has not invited onto his property, well - they was warned. And I doubt there would be an uproar from his town to charge him.

Scum that even think of looting need a killing - not a warning.

[VOA]

In case anyone doesn't know better; writing "killed" in a warning-sign like this is a very very bad idea.

Actually, this was the perfect time for him to spray-paint the addresses
(and hand out xeroxed directions) for the abodes of "Million Mom March"
supporters in his neighborhood.

[Old Professer]

And people keep asking me why I have been saying this place is going to the dogs.