To: Cannoneer No. 4
With all due respect, the Stryker's air transportability IS a big problem and it is true.
Washington Post; GAO Calls Stryker Too Heavy for Transport
Weight of Armored Vehicle Cuts Flying Range of C-130 Aircraft, Congress Is Told
"The Stryker program -- expected to have a total cost of about $8.7 billion for acquiring about 1,800 vehicles...." to me is a boondoggle. Unless one thinks $4,833,333 EACH is a 'good buy'?
10 posted on
08/14/2004 7:26:57 AM PDT by
Condor51
(May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. -- Gen G. Patton Jr)
To: Condor51
You would cancel the program because the vehicle is too heavy for the C-130?
What would you do with the Stryker Brigades already equipped?
With what would you replace the Stryker? How long would that take?
13 posted on
08/14/2004 8:13:36 AM PDT by
Cannoneer No. 4
(I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
To: Condor51
"The Stryker program -- expected to have a total cost of about $8.7 billion for acquiring about 1,800 vehicles...." to me is a boondoggle. Unless one thinks $4,833,333 EACH is a 'good buy'? They are a good buy if they funnel enough money back to your congressional district. That's all that matters in Washington.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson