Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cannoneer No. 4
With all due respect, the Stryker's air transportability IS a big problem and it is true.

Washington Post; GAO Calls Stryker Too Heavy for Transport
Weight of Armored Vehicle Cuts Flying Range of C-130 Aircraft, Congress Is Told

"The Stryker program -- expected to have a total cost of about $8.7 billion for acquiring about 1,800 vehicles...." to me is a boondoggle. Unless one thinks $4,833,333 EACH is a 'good buy'?

10 posted on 08/14/2004 7:26:57 AM PDT by Condor51 (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. -- Gen G. Patton Jr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Condor51
You would cancel the program because the vehicle is too heavy for the C-130?

What would you do with the Stryker Brigades already equipped?

With what would you replace the Stryker? How long would that take?

13 posted on 08/14/2004 8:13:36 AM PDT by Cannoneer No. 4 (I've lost turret power; I have my nods and my .50. Hooah. I will stay until relieved. White 2 out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Condor51
"The Stryker program -- expected to have a total cost of about $8.7 billion for acquiring about 1,800 vehicles...." to me is a boondoggle. Unless one thinks $4,833,333 EACH is a 'good buy'?

They are a good buy if they funnel enough money back to your congressional district. That's all that matters in Washington.

14 posted on 08/14/2004 8:14:26 AM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson