Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mewzilla

you've got to wonder, if you had warehouses stored with supplies for hurricanes, would you keep them in atlanta? wouldn't you want to keep them in locales more accessible to Florida, and to the SC/NC coastal areas, where they tend to hit?


1,513 posted on 08/13/2004 2:24:52 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1493 | View Replies ]


To: oceanview

I imagine they're coming in from a lot of places. But they can send the stuff from Atlanta now becuase by the time it gets there it will be safe to go in. The folks closer are probably still having to wait.


1,521 posted on 08/13/2004 2:28:04 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1513 | View Replies ]

To: oceanview
you've got to wonder, if you had warehouses stored with supplies for hurricanes, would you keep them in atlanta? wouldn't you want to keep them in locales more accessible to Florida, and to the SC/NC coastal areas, where they tend to hit?

Atlanta to Orlando is only an 8 hour drive.

1,525 posted on 08/13/2004 2:28:24 PM PDT by Vigilantcitizen (Have a burger and a beer and enjoy your liquid vegetables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1513 | View Replies ]

To: oceanview

Well, Atlanta is close enough where there's little danger of the supplies and stuff being damaged or destroyed by hurricanes and such that can hit any part of Florida...

I think it makes sense, when you also realize that the supplies are not just there for Florida, but for other disasters that may strike other states in the SE. Atlanta is pretty much the hub of the SE, with easy accessibility to the surrounding areas. Again, it makes sense from a deployment perspective :0)


1,535 posted on 08/13/2004 2:29:44 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (Try the new and improved Hippie-B-Gone Soap!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1513 | View Replies ]

To: oceanview
you've got to wonder, if you had warehouses stored with supplies for hurricanes, would you keep them in atlanta? wouldn't you want to keep them in locales more accessible to Florida, and to the SC/NC coastal areas, where they tend to hit?

You want the supplies far enough inland they don't get destroyed, yet centrally located to places that may be hit hard like Florida and North Carolina, with an excellent road network radiating out to all those places.

Sounds like....Atlanta.

1,537 posted on 08/13/2004 2:30:16 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1513 | View Replies ]

To: oceanview

I guess the thinking is that you want to keep the emergency supplies CLOSE but not IN the areas most likely to be damaged. How much good would it have been if you had a warehouse full of supplies in Ft. Meyers and then have that warehouse destroyed by the hurricane. Same reason you wouldn't put an ammo dump right on the front lines.


1,555 posted on 08/13/2004 2:34:21 PM PDT by Vinnie_Vidi_Vici
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1513 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson