Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: callmejoe

Re: Shukrijumah
He is not a "Saudi" He is not a Saudi Citizen. He was only born there. He is a muslim.
I thought you were never going to post again. What are you doing here? Shouldn't you be at church or "something". Why are you pushing "Look out for Shukrijumah" ?


3,359 posted on 08/20/2004 8:26:33 PM PDT by Selene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3269 | View Replies ]


To: Selene; callmejoe

I think everyone is pushing 'look out for Shukrijumah,' especially in recent weeks. He is not a Saudi, but for all intensive purposes his family is from there. His father was a wahabi cleric who relocated to south Florida after his stint in SA. The connections to SA are quite numerous. The connections between his father and other terrorists were quite numerous (he was a translator for the Blind Sheikh). The connections between el Shukri and 9/11 terrorists from SA are also quite numerous.

The press has widely reported that el Shukri is from Saudi, much to their chagrin. It is part myth/part reality; a common mistake.

http://www.fbi.gov/terrorinfo/adnan.htm
http://www.saudiembassy.net/2003News/Press/PressDetail.asp?cYear=2003&cIndex=126


3,363 posted on 08/20/2004 8:46:08 PM PDT by nwctwx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3359 | View Replies ]

To: Selene

It has been posted on this thread in articles and reports that Shukrijumah was born in Saudi Arabia; however, the Saudis deny this fact.

Please defend your attack on in your post 3269. After reviewing each post involved when callmejoe was attacked earlier this month, I see no evidence that he defends radical extremist muslim terrorists.

In fact, he stated that he is a Christian. I am a Christian, and it is my understanding that God will judge us, and that we should not pass judgement on one another. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I refer to Matthew 7:1-5 and James 4:11.

Callmejoe's posts have been very well thought out and contain a lot of substance. He knows a great deal about the WOT and is a valuable contributor. I think that attacks are warranted for an enemy.

There are a lot of opinions we form that are based on our unique experiences. During a war, we can scarcely afford to alienate someone who is clearly against the terrorists and on the right team. Dogmatic differences should not trump our common goal to defeat the enemy. We need to pick our battles.

I believe in a good-hearted discussion, but heated discussions should be private. To raise doubt about someone's integrity on a public thread is not appropriate. I've seen too many valuable people alienated by antagonism and taunting not to speak my mind on this issue.

Rant over. Ready for the onslaught.


3,369 posted on 08/20/2004 9:30:06 PM PDT by Honestly (There is nothing so likely to produce peace as to be well prepared to meet the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3359 | View Replies ]

To: Selene; nwctwx; callmejoe

Deep breath, Selene.

Everyone's opinion is valuable here.


3,371 posted on 08/20/2004 10:01:51 PM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3359 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson