Again, I don't think this is a good way to attack Kerry. Along with the SB vet kickoff last week, there came a good deal of bad press the SB vets got in the latter half of the week. Its coming down to a "he said-I said" contest. Kerry has his group of vets, the SB vets have theirs. The public is left to decide who to believe. Part of their decision involves why would one or the other lie. Kerry ends up being the martyr since he's being attacked rather harshly. You never ever make your political opponent a martyr and give them the sympathy vote.
The SB vets may feel good, but I think its the wrong way to go about this.
JMHO.
The American people just don't understand that Vietnam Vets have had to live in the tent pitched for them by John Kerry, as dishonorable men of the highest order, because of his lying testimony to Congress in the early 1970's. We are still PO'd and this time we can do something about it. We are not going away....
For those of us who were there it is obvious his exploits in 4 months could only have happened in his mind. Combat is not like that...anyone with half a brain could ascertain he was a lying fraud. So those of you who have no reference point....trust me....the swifties are telling the truth. Ask yourself: "What would they have to gain by lying about Kerry"? If it had been anybody else in that unit running for President....those guys would have been falling over themselves to support him....but the only support Kerry can muster is a few EM...that frankly are having their 15 minutes of fame and in all likelihood have been promised God only knows what if this Traitor is elected.
Another relevant question....has Kerry regularly traded phone calls, had dinner with them...attended reunions? I think not. They are window dressing...pure and simple.
My advice: Make another contribution at www.swiftvets.com
I have and as Jackie Gleason used to say "HOW GOOD IT FEELS"