Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
Now, I think you all have to ask yourselves, when you see somebody agonizing about something that's clear and making a decision they are under no particular pressure to make, where the facts don't bear out your opponents and yet, at the end of the day, they come down with a view that crosses the line between complicity and principle, they didn't do that because they were forced to it. See, my problem is that I sit in front of a decision like that and I say this is a decision where somebody sat down to figure out how much evil they could get away with. Now, I know, my friends, that after many years of Bill Clinton we may have lowered our standards to such an extent that all we care about is this, this evil [we've avoided]. That's not what built this country.
397 posted on 08/08/2004 11:04:22 AM PDT by Howlin (Saving Private Hamster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin

His meaning has always been obvious to me.

These are the kinds of things that make me see him as a mixed bag. If hell froze over and he won this race, would we hear more of that sort of nasty rhetoric aimed at the President, not in World Net Daily, but from the Senate floor?


402 posted on 08/08/2004 11:08:13 AM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Some of my best friends are white, middle-class males.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson