Skip to comments.
Kerry Is Toast on the Gay Marriage Issue (Signed a Letter in 2002 Backing Gay Marriage!!!!)
Aug/7/04
| jveritas
Posted on 08/07/2004 9:34:39 AM PDT by jveritas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
To: jveritas
Let's see CUT AND RUN Kerry avoid this one!
61
posted on
08/07/2004 11:29:04 AM PDT
by
RasterMaster
(Saddam's family was a WMD - We FOUND him and sons are DEAD!)
To: jveritas
LBT
-=-=-
62
posted on
08/07/2004 11:42:17 AM PDT
by
LiberalBassTurds
(Al Qaeda needs to know we are fluent in the "dialogue of bullets.")
To: jveritas
Eleanor (Eldie) Acheson, is a
member of GLBT (Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgendered) and
currently a campaign adviser and liaison for presidential candidate John Kerry to the gay community. Eldie was one of Hillary Rodham's roommates at Wellesley College and named Assistant Attorney General for Policy Development, in charge of choosing Federal judicial nominations by President Clinton.
"Democratic activists are working to ensure that the GLBT community has a visible presence both on the convention floor and within party leadership at this year's Democratic National Convention." (baywindows.com) As a freshman senator, Kerry sponsored the first gay equal rights legislation ever introduced in that body, the Civil Rights Amendments Act of 1985, which would have outlawed discrimination based on sexual orientation in employment, housing and credit. Kerry was one of only 14 senators who voted against the 1996 federal defense of marriage act, giving him a perfect Human Rights Campaign legislative score since 1995. (gaypeopleschronicle.com)
There is more information and sources on my web site dedicated to exposing Hillary.
63
posted on
08/07/2004 11:45:18 AM PDT
by
christie
(http://www.hillaryforpresident-2008.com -- NOT!)
To: jveritas
re: Flip-Flop
Today, Kerry said he did approve of people having a pulse.
Last week, he opposed pulses.
64
posted on
08/07/2004 12:27:42 PM PDT
by
MindBender26
(Kill all Islamic terrorists now. Then they cannot kill our sons and daughters tomorrow)
To: jveritas
"That is why he is toast." Not
A Republican can say "read my lips" and be toast.
A RAT cannot be toast under any condition because of the NYT, etc!
65
posted on
08/07/2004 12:35:44 PM PDT
by
TRY ONE
(NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
To: TRY ONE
So why the Democrats are losing so many elections if they are so powerful?
It is good to know the strength of your opponent but it is not good to overrate your opponent strength to the degree where you make him invincible in your mind.
66
posted on
08/07/2004 12:55:33 PM PDT
by
jveritas
To: jveritas
67
posted on
08/07/2004 3:07:13 PM PDT
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: jveritas
I haven't read this whole thread yet, but I have to say this........
He was for homosexual marriage before he was against it.
How late am I? LOL!
68
posted on
08/07/2004 3:27:19 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: jveritas
Darn you FReepers are good! Great find!
69
posted on
08/07/2004 3:29:27 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: rwfromkansas
This does not look like a flip-flop. The group that pushed for the amendment in 2002 wanted to ban same sex unions, not just marriage. They thought this amendment would do it.You're right. There's no flip flop this time. What bothers me about this letter is he's taking away the right of the people of Massachusetts to vote on anything. What if they don't want homosexual unions, either?
70
posted on
08/07/2004 3:46:49 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: christie
As a freshman senator, Kerry sponsored the first gay equal rights legislation ever introduced in that body, the Civil Rights Amendments Act of 1985, which would have outlawed discrimination based on sexual orientation in employment, housing and credit. Kerry was one of only 14 senators who voted against the 1996 federal defense of marriage act, giving him a perfect Human Rights Campaign legislative score since 1995.Kerry was the one responsible for homosexual "rights"???
He started all this homosexual stuff going on in this country right now?????
If it weren't for Kerry, people wouldn't be waring in court to save marriage ?????
71
posted on
08/07/2004 3:52:11 PM PDT
by
concerned about politics
( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
To: jveritas
but Kerry assured us it's a "states right" issue!
72
posted on
08/07/2004 3:52:53 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: jveritas
It just doesn't matter to Democrats. It just doesn't matter. He can flip and flop 500 times a day and they will still vote for him. It's just about getting rid of W.
73
posted on
08/07/2004 4:24:12 PM PDT
by
sarasota
To: jveritas
Bump! Hope the Bush campaign is gathering this ammo.
74
posted on
08/07/2004 4:41:18 PM PDT
by
Bubbette
(President Reagan, you are my hero.)
To: votelife
75
posted on
08/07/2004 4:47:57 PM PDT
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
To: rwfromkansas
but politically, there is a differenceThere isn't really a political difference either. At least not in the version Kerry advocates, one that is completely equal both locally and federally. The only value of a different name is a functional value. It will prevent chaos when different states legislate differently. The difference is in the minds of the deceivers and those they manage to fool.
"Domestic Partners" is different in that it has even been used to allow any persons living together -- even non-sexually -- to attain insurance benefits from an employed domestic partner. Non married heterosexuals can do it. Non-sexual family members can do it (at least in some cases). It that situation, the public isn't forced to "recognize" a couple solely for their immoral relationship. there is no requirement to make it equal to marriage. Of course, the term could be redefined by the left, just like marriage, and come to mean the exact same thing as marriage and civil union.
76
posted on
08/07/2004 5:00:45 PM PDT
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
To: concerned about politics
good point. What business does Kerry have injecting himself into a state debate?
77
posted on
08/07/2004 5:24:40 PM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
(BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
To: jveritas
Take it easy on poor "Flipper" Kerry, he's had his eye on new "boy toy" John Edwards for years and he wants to make it permanent. He just doesn't know how to tell Tuh-ray-zuh yet.
78
posted on
08/07/2004 6:43:37 PM PDT
by
Che Chihuahua
(Dealing with a liberal/ socialist/neo-communist is like dealing with a demented child on crack.)
To: jveritas
In other words, John F*ckin' is a hypocrite on state's rights. This doesn't really surprise me - you have a guy who'll say different things to different audiences, depending on what he thinks will get him elected. Kerry and principle do not go together.
79
posted on
08/07/2004 8:17:03 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: jveritas
To know a Kerry position on any given issue, you must know both sides of the issue.
80
posted on
08/08/2004 10:08:59 AM PDT
by
claudiustg
(Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson