To: lelio
When 150k jobs need to be created just to employ those entering the workforce, a number of 32k is hardly anything to rally around. It means around 120k people didn't get a job this month that wanted one. Oh, baloney. I've seen people throw out all sorts of numbers regarding that scenario. Jobs are being created. Period.
22 posted on
08/06/2004 5:43:55 AM PDT by
Coop
(In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
To: Coop
Jobs are being created. Period.
Well I can't argue with that. So the only bad situation is when there's a job loss? If 1 job was created in a month "jobs are being created!"?
26 posted on
08/06/2004 5:45:52 AM PDT by
lelio
To: Coop
It's nice to be optimistic but it also helps to be realistic as well. If you can put a positive spin on this you should call the RNC and go to work for them. Perception is reality, especially in a country where the population is getting dumber and dumber and is eaasily led around by the media. The negative spin on this is going to be tremendous and how do we refute that?
To: Coop
If new jobs don't outpace demand via new people (immigration) or just new job seekers, then that's not a good thing. It's not as simple as "new jobs were created."
285 posted on
08/06/2004 8:21:29 AM PDT by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson