Initially, I wasn't comfortable with these accusations. But the more that I hear of their story, the more interested I am in the details. If what they say is remotely true, then it is their duty - just as John Kerry felt that it was his duty to enlighten America about perceived atrocity - to bring this issue to the attention of the American people concerning a man that is being considered for the position of Commander and Chief of the United States Armed forces in a time of mortal conflict.
Additionally, I POSITIVELY love the change in tide here. Lefty callers were enraged with Medved and his guest, accusing them of fabricating lies and outrageous accustations about Kerry for political advantage.
HELLO!!! Care for a bit of tat with your tit, you suckling Moonbats! At least they didn't call Kerry, "Hitler."
I listened to Van O'Dell on Medved. The entire interview. He seems like a regular guy who felt he had to step forward.
If he's typical of this group, they're going to have a tough time discrediting them.
To the interview/callers - I thought he was well spoken, very clear, very specific. Like he said, just because some of those guys weren't on lurch's boat doesn't mean they didn't bunk together, and see each other in the water on a near daily basis.
I thought he was very credible.