Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rwfromkansas

Yeah, but it doesn't seem like they're actually going after SwiftVets. That would be a direct challenge, which would ultimately collapse on them. They're going after the messenger, who is more likely to back down.


77 posted on 08/05/2004 12:14:53 PM PDT by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: william clark

Very good point.


132 posted on 08/05/2004 12:24:06 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: william clark

correct.

I hopefully was clear that IF they sue the Swiftvets, they could countersue for discovery.


236 posted on 08/05/2004 12:40:52 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (BYPASS FORCED WEB REGISTRATION! **** http://www.bugmenot.com ****)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: william clark

Eactly! And they will back down, because they back Kerry.
Think Sandy Berger. Think Juanita Broderick. Remember that interview? It aired one time, right? Then nothing.

Each time an issue comes up and we think, oh, for sure now this will open eyes, it gets glossed over and left in the dust.

Kerry will not be "damaged" because the other side will vote for anybody but Bush no matter what. And the media will back anybody but Bush no matter what.


332 posted on 08/05/2004 1:03:58 PM PDT by Right-wing Librarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson