If he's been around FR for any length of time he'd know that this is no rah-rah section for W. Many of us have been angry w/ some of his policies, even his most loyal supporters have raised questions.
It's also absurd for a liberal to say that we are a nation of laws when the liberal courts redefine what the "laws" are so frequently.
Finally, its important to remember that the primary reason for going into Iraq was to destroy Saddam: mission accomplished. Rebuilding a democratic Iraq would be the single greatest blow against our enemies and is worth the effort.
And if he's a liberal columnist, he has a demonstrated ability to ignore inconvenient facts.
A couple things:
If he's been around FR for any length of time he'd know that this is no rah-rah section for W. Many of us have been angry w/ some of his policies, even his most loyal supporters have raised questions.
-----
Pietro, two things: first of all, check out the live thread on Bush's 4/04 press conference. It was stunningly worshipful. Second, it's my understanding some pretty serious charges have been made (pretty serious if you take the name of the site seriously) that paleocons critical of Bush have been banned from Free Republic.