Does this incident give the nuke scenario from a few weeks back any credibility? Someone did mention to watch for dead fish to be washing up, now here they are.
FYI - Here's another dead "fish story"
http://www.nj.com/newsflash/international/index.ssf?/base/international-7/1091628541319290.xml&storylist=international
Not unless someone has invented a special type of nuke that only effects the atlantic croaker, prevents the dead fish from deteriorating for more than two weeks, and reverses the direction of the Gulf Stream current. But I'm sure that won't stop some people from using the dead fish as proof of the nuke story.
Let's say you're the President and you've been told there are 15 devices really to go off. One each day. Five have been found and neutralized, one is found and dumped at sea. Do you tell people about it the incident? Do you tell them that that there are 9 more devices out there and you're frantically looking for them? Talk about panic sex!
Surely someone would've noticed a nuke going off underwater ... but then again, maybe it's just another coverup.
Yes. I, for one, suggested people on the east coast should be on the lookout for unusually high numbers of dead fish washing ashore. Hmmmmmmmm.
Also suggested monitoring fish catch numbers... seeing if the haul numbers were unusually low.
I missed that. Are there any links or URLs to FR messages on it?