Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right_Handed_Writer

Good thinking but I think that is way too complex. They could move a nuke on the ground easier. Putting it in an airplane would require them to jump several more unnecessary hurdles, each w the possibility of discovery.


2,919 posted on 08/07/2004 10:43:56 AM PDT by Indie (Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2894 | View Replies ]


To: Indie
For their purposes, taking the large chance of discovery or logistical failure in order to achieve an airburst [more initial damage to people from the fireball, less by fallout] would be folly to achieve their aims when a groundburst would do quite nicely, thank you.

It would be the equivalent of a car bomber trying to choose a Cadillac rather than a Mercedes because it looks better...

This is way off track IMO.

2,920 posted on 08/07/2004 10:49:55 AM PDT by Indie (Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2919 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson