[Dominic Harr]

For Mozilla/Firefox users who think they are above the vunerabilities, etc.

What is this ignorance on the part of some MS-only computer users that makes this so hard for some to comprehend?

A Mercedes breaks down far, far less often than a Chevy. But can you imagine a Chevy-only devotee getting out there seeing a Merc broken down and saying, "See, it's no better than any other car".

• Only MS-only folks defending MS say Firefox is invulnerable. Firefox users say it breaks far less often.

  For God's sake, I've had to patch my IE how many times this year already?

It's as if MS-only folks have absolutely no idea what "quality" even means . . . (fill in your own joke here).

[Bush2000]

A Mercedes breaks down far, far less often than a Chevy.

Bogus analogy. IE has tons of malicious people trying to dismantle the "engine" while it's running -- while marginal browsers don't have the same kinds of attacks. To attribute this to differences in quality is just ridiculous. As we see from this posting, Mozilla/Firefox ain't Mercedes. When subjected to the same kinds of attention, they break down similarly.